SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 649

VIJAY BAHUGUNA
Kumari Mohini Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Allahabad University – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : V.B. Singh.
For the Respondent: Haider Husain.

JUDGMENT :

VIJAY BAHUGUNA, J.

1. Heard Sri V.B. Singh, counsel for the Petitioner and Sri S.J. Haidar, Counsel for the Allahabad University.

2. By means of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the Petitioners challenge the validity of Rule 6 of the Admission Information Booklet 1992-93 and further pray for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Allahabad University to admit them in B.A. Part I in the subjects, which they had offered.

3. The facts in brief are that the Petitioners had passed their Inter mediate examination of the year 1992. The subjects of the Petitioners were Hindi, English, Vocational Foundation subject and Vocational Photography. The vocational subjects are wood work, leather work, book binding. Spinning and Weaving Dying and Laundry work (all practical subjects).

4. The admission policy of the University as framed by the Admissions Committee is contained in the booklet issued by the University in this regard. The admission policy was formulated by the Admissions Committee and the same was approved by the Academic Council. The Admissions Committee decided to give only the benefit of 2% to the students, who had offered vocational subject






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top