SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 885

VED PRAKASH VAISH
Sawwad Ali – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mohammad Saeed-II.
For the Respondent: H.A.B. Sinha, Mohd. Arif Khan.

JUDGMENT :

Ved Prakash Vaish, J.

Heard Sri Mohd. Saeed-II, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Mohd. Arif Khan, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Mohd. Aslam Khan, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The appellant, by filing present second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "C.P.C."), assails the judgment and decree dated 19.05.2005 passed by learned District Judge, Unnao, in Civil Appeal No.37 of 2001, whereby the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed.

3. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction, bearing Regular Suit No.372 of 1999 titled as Sawwad Ali v. Rajesh Kumar and others, restraining the respondents-defendants from forcibly dispossessing him except in due process of law. The case of the appellant-plaintiff was that he is a tenant in a shop situated in Mohalla Naseemganj, Kasba Bangarmau, Tehsil Safipur, District Unnao, on a monthly rent of Rs.150/- since 1992, the appellant is carrying on business of repairing of motorcycles in the said shop; the disputed shop was constructed in the year 1981-1982, the appellant-plaintiff had taken the disput

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top