JUDGMENT :

Ajit Kumar, J.

1. Heard Sri Rakesh Pande, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Shreya Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.K. Varma, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Bipin Lal Srivastava, learned counsel for the contesting respondents and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. By invoking the power of superintendence of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has questioned the propriety and legality of the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.4, Muzaffarnagar dated 13th May, 2019 in rejecting the application of the petitioner bearing Paper No.- 43-C filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'C.P.C.').

3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the contesting respondents and the petitioner entered into the some agreement whereunder the premises in question were leased out on rent to be paid as per the terms and agreement reached between the parties. It appears that there arose some dispute regarding dues of rent and consequently arrears which the plaintiffs-respondents claimed to have remained unpaid for long compelling the