SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Pritinker Diwaker, Raj Beer Singh, JJ.
Sudarshan - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Uttar Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 4796 of 2010
Decided On : 20-05-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Mewa Lal Shukla, Adv., R.P.S. Chauhan, Adv., Ram Jatan Yadav, Adv., Amit Sinha, Adv.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of prompt FIR, the scrutiny of interested witnesses' evidence, and the admissibility of eyewitness testimony in reaching a decision.

Headnote:

FIR - Murder - Sections 148, 323/149, 302, 342 of IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the application of Sections 148, 323/149, 302, and 342 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in the context of a murder case. The judgment highlighted the importance of eyewitness testimony, the admissibility of prompt FIR, and the scrutiny of interested witnesses' evidence.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased was attacked and killed by a group of accused persons due to an old land dispute. The mother of the deceased lodged a prompt FIR, and eyewitnesses testified to the incident. The accused were convicted based on the eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the eyewitness testimony and medical evidence supported the prosecution's case. It acknowledged minor contradictions in the witnesses' statements due to the passage of time but emphasized the overall credibility of the eyewitnesses.

Issues: The issues included the admissibility of prompt FIR, the credibility of interested witnesses, the scrutiny of eyewitness testimony, and the significance of minor contradictions in witness statements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of prompt FIR, the scrutiny of interested witnesses' evidence, and the admissibility of eyewitness testimony. It highlighted that minor contradictions in witness statements should not affect the overall credibility of the witnesses.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the trial Judge's decision to convict the appellants was upheld based on the cumulative effect of the evidence.

JUDGMENT :

Pritinker Diwaker, J.

This appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 13.7.2010 passed by Special Judge (E C Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia in Sessions Trial No.174 of 1998 (State v. Nathuni & others), convicting accused Sudarshan under Sections 148, 323/149, 302 and 342 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment; to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment; to undergo imprisonment for life, with a fine of Rs.3000/-, in default thereof, to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment respectively. Rest of the accused, namely, Deena, Parma (since deceased), Bhola, Prabhu, Parashuram, Suryabali (since deceased), Ambika and Sachita have been convicted under Sections 147, 323, 302/149 and 342 of IPC and sentenced them to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment; to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment; to undergo imprisonment for life, with a fine of Rs.3000/- each, in default thereof, one year rigorous imprisonment and to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment respectively. All sentences shall run concurrently.

2. In the present case, name of the deceased is Prabhu, son of Kamta (PW-1) and Sarali Devi (PW-2). On 24.4.1997 at 5:50 am, a written report, Ex. Ka.1 was lodged by (PW-2), alleging in it that at about 3:00 am, when she and her husband were sleeping at the doorstep of their house; light was switched on; it was a full moonlight and her son Prabhu was sleeping on the roof of his friend Chhotak. On account of an old land dispute, accused persons carrying deadly weapons, like clubs, ballam, farsa and gandasa, reached to the roof of Chhotak and caused injuries to the deceased. She has alleged that Ramji Jaiswal, who was sleeping along with deceased, and the deceased both raised their cries and upon hearing the same, she, her husband Kamta (PW-1), Uma Shanker (PW-3), Ram Bilas (not-examined), Brij Kishore (PW-4) reached to the place of occurrence and saw accused Nathuni (died during pendency of trial) causing injuries to her son and bringing him down from the roof. She states that all the accused persons took the deceased along with them near the house of accused Nathuni, tied him up with a peg and caused several injuries to him. She states that when the deceased became unconscious, leaving him as it is, all the accused persons fled away from the spot. It has also been stated by her that she and other witnesses have intervened in the matter, but she too was beaten by the accused persons. Based on her written report, FIR Ex.Ka.16 was registered against the appellants, including three deceased accused persons, namely, Nathuni, Parma and Suryabali under Sections 147/148/149/342/323/302 of IPC.

3. Inquest on dead body of the deceased was conducted, vide Ex.Ka.10 on 24.4.1997 and the dead body was sent for postmortem which was conducted on 25.4.1997, vide Ex.Ka.3 by Dr A K Rai (PW-6).

The Autopsy Surgeon has noted following eleven injuries on the body of the deceased:

"1. Ante-Mortem Incised wound of 2 cm x 0.5 cm and 0.5 cm. Deep 3 cm above the middle of the right eyebrow on right side. The margin of wound is sharp.

2. Ante-Mortem Incised wound of sharp Marginal of 2 cm. x 0.5 cm and 3 cm Deep posterior aspect of the left arm 10 cm above the left elbow joint towards Lt. shoulder joint.

3. Ante-Mortem Incised wound of 2 cm x 0.5 cm and 5 cm. Deep posterior aspect of right arm, 14 cm above the right elbow joint.

4. Ante-Mortem Incised and penetrating wound of 2 cm x 0.5 cm x 4 cm. Deep 9 cm above the elbow joint on the posterior aspect of right arm.

5. Ante-Mortem Incised wound of 2 cm x 0.5 cm x 4 cm on the posterior aspect of right elbow joint.

6. Ante-Mortem Incised wound and penetrating wound of 2 cm x 2 cm x 0.5 cm x 4 cm Deep on the anterior-lateral aspect of lower leg right side, 13 cm above the right ankle joint.

7. Ante-Mortem Incised wound of 4 cm x 0.5 cm x 4 cm on the anterior lateral aspect of right leg, 7 cm above the right ankle joint.

8.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top