SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 997

PRITINKER DIWAKER, RAJ BEER SINGH
Sudarshan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mewa Lal Shukla, Adv., R.P.S. Chauhan, Adv., Ram Jatan Yadav, Adv., Amit Sinha, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Pritinker Diwaker, J.

This appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 13.7.2010 passed by Special Judge (E C Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia in Sessions Trial No.174 of 1998 (State v. Nathuni & others), convicting accused Sudarshan under Sections 148, 323/149, 302 and 342 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment; to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment; to undergo imprisonment for life, with a fine of Rs.3000/-, in default thereof, to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment respectively. Rest of the accused, namely, Deena, Parma (since deceased), Bhola, Prabhu, Parashuram, Suryabali (since deceased), Ambika and Sachita have been convicted under Sections 147, 323, 302/149 and 342 of IPC and sentenced them to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment; to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment; to undergo imprisonment for life, with a fine of Rs.3000/- each, in default thereof, one year rigorous imprisonment and to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment respectively. All sentences shall run concurrently.

2. In the present case, name of the deceased is Prabhu, son of Kamta (PW-1) and Sara

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top