ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Shubham Garg – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Maheshwari – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.
1. Present application under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the applicant/petitioner for the appointment of an independent Arbitrator and further seeking a relief for restraining the proceedings of the arbitration case which was initiated by the sole respondent.
2. Factual matrix of the case is that one Shyam Lal father of applicant Nos. 4 and 5 had purchased shares of one Dynamic Laminates India Ltd., a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act. As the Company had outstanding dues of State Bank of Patiala, to the tune of Rs. 1,88,00,000/-, the said amount was to be paid by Shyam Lal to the Bank and further a sum of Rs. 2,41,00,000/- to the Company. Thus, the total amount payable was Rs. 4,29,00,000/-. This payment was to be made by 30.11.2014.
3. An agreement to this effect was executed between Shyam Lal and the Managing Director of M/s. Dynamic Laminates India Ltd. on 18.11.2014.
4. One Sri B.S. Mahesh, Advocate of Muzaffar Nagar was witness to the said agreement. Further, in paragraph 2 of the agreement it is stated that, it was executed at the office of Sri B.S. Mahesh, Advocate.
Aravali Power Corporation Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s. Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
Antrix Corporation Ltd. vs. Devas Multimedia (P) Ltd.
M/s. Aargee Engineers and Co. and another vs. Era Infra Engineering Ltd. And others 2017 (4) ADJ 513
Voestalpine Schienen GmbH Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.