IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.
Raj Kumar Mulani - Appellant
Vs.
Ramesh Kumar Hemrajani - Respondent
Matters Under Article 227 No. 6791 of 2019
Decided On : 19-09-2019
Amendment Application - Rent Dispute - U.P. Rent Act No.13 - Summary of Acts and Sections: U.P. Rent Act No.13 - Section 20 - The court discussed the legal provisions related to the withdrawal of admissions made in the pleadings and the principles governing the amendment of pleadings. The court highlighted the overruling of the judgment in Sushil Kumar Jain (2009) 14 SCC 38 by a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Ram Niranjan Kajaria (2015) 10 SCC 203, emphasizing that a categorical admission made in the pleadings cannot be permitted to be withdrawn by way of an amendment.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff-respondent sought to evict the defendant-petitioner from a tenanted accommodation due to non-vacation after the termination of tenancy. The defendant-petitioner filed an Amendment Application seeking to amend the written statement to withdraw admissions made regarding the agreed rent.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Amendment Application was not bonafide and that a categorical admission made in the pleadings cannot be permitted to be withdrawn by way of an amendment. The court upheld the rejection of the Amendment Application and the dismissal of the Revision petition.
Issues: The main issue was whether the defendant-petitioner could withdraw admissions made in the written statement through an Amendment Application.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a categorical admission made in the pleadings cannot be withdrawn by way of an amendment, citing the overruling of the judgment in Sushil Kumar Jain (2009) 14 SCC 38 by a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Ram Niranjan Kajaria (2015) 10 SCC 203.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed with a cost of Rs.5000.
JUDGMENT :
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.
Heard Sri Jayant Kumar, learned counsel for the defendant-petitioner and Sri Atul Dayal, learned senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Ayush Khanna, learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent.
2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed praying for the following relief:-
Facts
2. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that the plaintiff-respondent is the owner and landlord of the premises No.107/170-B, F. Road, Jawahar Nagar, Kanpur Nagar. In the said premises certain accommodation has been let out by the plaintiff-respondent to the defendant-petitioner at an agreed monthly rent of Rs.2650/- including taxes. The plaintiff-respondent did not want to continue the tenancy of the defendant-petitioner, therefore, he gave a legal notice to the defendant-petitioner dated 24.09.2015 by registered post determining the tenancy and requiring the tenant to vacate the tenanted accommodation. Since the tenanted portion was not vacated by the defendant-petitioner, therefore, the plaintiff-respondent filed S.C.C. Suit No.311 of 2015 (Ramesh Kumar Hemrajani Vs. Raj Kumar Mulani) on 21.12.2015. The defendant-petitioner filed a written statement dated 19.05.2016 in which he admitted the contents of paragraph nos. 1 & 2 of the plaint. He admitted agreed rate of rent to be Rs.2650/- inclusive of all taxes. In other paragraphs also he admitted this fact. Relevant paragraph nos. 1,4 & 8 of the written statement dated 19.05.2016 are reproduced below:-
"(1) That the contents of para 1 & 2 of the suit as stated is admitted with correction that beside shop and bhandaria on ground floor the defendant is tenant of one 8 x10 sq. feet room situated at first floor of the said premises subject to payment of agreed rent of 2650/- including all of taxes however plaintiff has to proof his statements of para 1 and para 2 of plaint.
(4) That the contents of para 6,7,8 and 9 of the plaint as stated are not admitted to defendant being incorrect and false. Plaintiff grab a fictitious story to evict the defendant illegally from the tenancy area of she said premise by way of illegal and baseless notice dt. 24.9.15 which has no legal value and on the basis of that the said demand of damages of Rs.20,000/- per month as the prevailing rate of rent is void ab-initio since plaintiff accept the agreed rent of Rs.2650/- per month including taxes after giving the said notice the whole proceeding became infructuous and plaintiff has strict proof of his plaint para 6,7,8 and 9. Defendant is valid tenant of the said premises and is not liable to pay any damages of Rs.36,000/- or 20,000/- per month as demanded by plaintiff.
(8) That the Choith Ram Mulani son of Galumal was the tenant of one shop, one bhandaria on ground floor and one room on first floor of the said premises at the rate of 40/- Rs. per month in the year of 1966 and gradually the landlord increases the tax and rent as 50/- Rs.,60/- Rs. and lastly Rs.1500/- in 1996 and till 26.01.2003 at the death of Choith Ram and thereafter the plaintiff and his brother Ashok Kumar became the tenant of the said accommodation and landlord received the rent in cash by their tenants and now the plaintiff received the agreed rent of Rs.1950/- and 700/- as taxes total Rs.2650/- and the present premises fall within the provisions of U.P. Rent Act No.13 and the defendant is protected under the said Act hence the suit is infructuous and liable to be set aside."
3. After about 17 months the defendant-petitioner filed an Amendment Application dated 04.10.2017 seekin
Baldev Singh & Ors. Vs. Manohar Singh & Anr.
Gautam Sarup Vs. Leela Jetly and others
Nagindas Ramdas Vs. Dalpatram Ichharam alias Brijram and others
Panchdeo Narain Srivastava Vs. Jyoti Sahay
Panchdeo Narain Srivastava Vs. K. Jyoti Sahay
Ram Niranjan Kajaria Vs. Sheo Prakash Kajaria and others
Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and others
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.