PANKAJ MITHAL, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Anand Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Prem Chandra Saroj learned counsel, on behalf of the petitioners, is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Prem Chandra Saroj, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Shivam Yadav, learned counsel for the fourth respondent and Sri Mata Prasad, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.
3. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to allot developed abadi plot to the petitioners to the extent of 10% of their acquired land in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Gajraj Singh and Others vs. State of U.P. and Others, 2011 (11) ADJ 1 (FB).
4. The petitioners claim to be owners of certain land parcels situate in Village Soharkha Jahidabad, Pargana and Tehsil Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar which were subject matter of acquisition proceedings in terms of notification dated 31.07.2005 issued under Section 4 (1)/17(4), and the notification dated 27.07.2006 issued under Section 6/17 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners admit to having received compensation amount and also additional compensation at the rate of 64.70% in view of the Full Bench judgm
Bondu Ramaswamy vs. Bangalore Development Authority
Ravindra Kumar vs. District Magistrate, Agra and Others
Gajraj Singh and Others vs. State of U.P. and Others
Savitri Devi vs. State of U.P. and Others
Khatoon and Others vs. State of U.P. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.