Hasam vs State of U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 1929

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(All) 1929

NAHEED ARA MOONIS, ANIL KUMAR
Hasam – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sushil Kumar Pandey, Adv., Abhinav Singh, Adv., Anil Raghav, Adv., Brijesh Sahai, Adv., Nazrul Islam Jafri, Adv., Veer Singh, Adv., Bakhtyar Yusuf, Adv.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case involving murder. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court observes reliability of witness testimonies despite minor contradictions. (Para 41 , 42 , 44 , 49 , 50 , 62 , 63 , 68)
3. arguments raise doubts about witness credibility and case motive. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 54 , 56 , 58)
4. establishes that absence of motive does not invalidate prosecution case. (Para 59 , 60 , 64 , 69)
5. final decision affirms conviction of the accused for murder. (Para 70 , 71)

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR, J.

1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23.04.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge Court No. 9, Muzaffarnagar in Sessions Trial No. 405 of 2005 (State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Hasam and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 06 of 2005 under Section 302 Indian Penal Code (here-in-after referred to as "I.P.C."), Police Station- Chhapar, District- Muzaffarnagar whereby both the appellants Hasam and Nazam have been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- under I.P.C. with default stipulation.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that the informant Mohabbat Ali has lodged F.I.R. on 16.01.2005 at 05:15

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(All) 1929

NAHEED ARA MOONIS, ANIL KUMARHasam – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

NAHEED ARA MOONIS, ANIL KUMAR
Hasam – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent