JUDGMENT :

J.J. Munir, J.

Heard Sri Narendra Kumar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Satish Mohan Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 at length. Sri Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.3, but he is not present when the case is called on. So far as respondent Nos. 4 to 14 are concerned, service upon them has been held sufficient vide order dated 13.08.2019. No one appears on behalf of respondent Nos.4 to 14. Today, this matter has come up for final hearing as directed vide order dated 13.08.2019.

2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned orders dated 13.09.2018 and 30.06.2019, passed by the Board of Revenue, U.P. at Allahabad in Revision No.1322 of 2018 (Computerized Case No.AL20180531001322) Keshav Prasad Vs. Dhruv Chand and to quash proceedings in the said Revision. The short facts giving rise to the present petition are that the father of the petitioners filed Case No.T-20130531035785 (Barsu Ram Vs. Roop Chandra & Ors.) under Section 41 Land Revenue Act, 1901 (in short 'the Act') for demarcation of boundaries of Arazi Nos. 36Kha and 74/41. This application wa