AJAI LAMBA, MANISH MATHUR
Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari Sultanpur – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar – Respondent
ORDER :
(C.M. Application No.32438 of 2011)
1. The application seeks condonation of delay in filing the Special Appeal.
2. For reasons given in the affidavit in support of the application for condonation of delay, the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
3. The application is accordingly allowed.
4. We have heard learned counsel for appellant Sri Jyotinjay Verma, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 Sri Vinod Kumar Gupta Advocate holding brief of Sri Pt. S. Chandra learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and Sri Amitabh Shukla, learned counsel for the State.
5. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 28.10.2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 7514 (S/S) of 2010 whereby the opposite parties were directed to pay regular salary to the petitioner every month.
6. As per the pleadings in the appeal and the affidavit, filed in support of the application for stay, one Pawan Kumar filed the aforesaid Writ Petition praying for a direction to the opposite parties to pay salary to him for the Class IV post of Peon with all consequential benefits along with arrears of salary dues since 1.05.2000 along with interest. It has been stated that the said person had claimed to have been appoint
Raja Khan v. U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board and another
Pramod Kumar v. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission and others reported in (2008) 7 SCC 153
Amrit Lal Berry v. Collector of Central Excise
Ashutosh Shrotriya and others v. Vice Chancellor
Shah Babulal Khimji v. Jayaben D. Kania and another reported in (1981) 4 SCC 8
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.