ANIL KUMAR, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Shilpa Electrical Engineers (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
U. P. State Information Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kumar, Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ.
1. Heard Shri Amit Kr. Singh Bhadauriya as well as Shri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the opposite party No. 1, Shri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 and Shri Shree Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 4 and 5.
2. Since, the point involved in the present writ petition is trivial in nature, so the writ petition is being decided at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.
3. Notice to the opposite party No. 6 is dispensed with.
4. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following main relief’s:
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari setting aside the impugned order dated 15.5.2019 passed by the State Information Commissioner/respondent No. 2."
5. Shri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel appearing for the opposite par
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.