SAURABH LAVANIA
Aditya Swarup Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Srawasthi Gramin Bank – Respondent
ORDER :
SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of punishment dated 30.09.1989, whereby the petitioner was removed from the services of the Bank namely Shrawasti Gramin Bank and the order dated 19.01.1990 passed in the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of removal dated 30.09.1989, whereby the Appellate Authority of the Bank modified the punishment of removal to the punishment of reversion to the post of Field Supervisor.
2. At this juncture, it is relevant to point out that during the pendency of the writ petition, the application for amendment was moved by the petitioner for amending/incorporating Allahabad U.P. Gramin Bank in place of Shrawasti Gramin Bank on the basis of the notification of Government of India dated 02.03.2010, which was issued with respect to amalgamation of Gramin Banks.
3. Considering the same, this Court on 08.04.2015 allowed the application for amendment and permitted the petitioner to incorporate the necessary amendment. Pursuant to the order dated 08.04.2015, necessary amendments were incorporated by the petitioner in the memo of the writ petition on 08:04.2015.
4. Now, the contesting
State of U.P. v. Shatrughan Lal (1998) 6 SCC 651 : AIR 1998 SC 3038
Chandrama Tewari v. Union of India and others
Anil Kumar v. Presiding Officer and others
Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank and others (2009) 2 SCC 570 : AIR 2008 SC (Supp) 921
Moti Ram v. State of U.P. and others
Dr. Bishambhar Dayal Gupta v. The Visitor/President of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.