JUDGMENT :

Abdul Moin, J.

1. Heard. At the very outset, Sri Shiv Raj Mohan Nigam, learned counsel for the petitioner, made a request that he is unable to see clearly as such his friend, colleague and Advocate Sri H.M. Mathur be permitted to argue the matter on his behalf.

2. Accordingly, seeing the personal difficulty of Sri Nigam, this Court permitted Sri H.M. Mathur, Advocate, to argue the matter.

3. Heard Sri Shiv Raj Mohan Nigam, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri H.M. Mathur, Advocate, who has assisted the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. Present contempt petition has been filed under Sections 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1971) alleging non-compliance of the orders issued by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow, as per the order sheet, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure-1 to the contempt petition.

5. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow, through various orders had required the officials concerned to submit a report but despite sending various letters, as would be apparent from perusal of the order sheet, on 20.07.2018, 24.09.20