IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
BALA KRISHNA NARAYANA, SHAMIM AHMED, JJ.
Smt. Poonam - Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Bariyani - Respondent
First Appeal No. 355 of 2017
Decided On : 03-01-2020
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 13-B – Decree of divorce by Mutual Consent – Appeal against judgment and order passed by Family Court under Section 13-B of Act, 1955 has been dismissed on ground that respondent has withdrawn his consent – Held, This court not find that Court below committed any illegality or legal infirmity in holding that consent given in divorce by mutual consent can be withdrawn by one of parties before Court grants a decree of divorce by mutual consent – When consent by one of parties is withdrawn Court cannot pass a decree of divorce by mutual consent – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 13 and 14)
Facts of the case:
Parties have been living separately for past seven years and respondent, after giving his consent to divorce by mutual consent had withdrawn same after two and half years Family Judge was not at all legally justified in dismissing Case.
Findings of the court:
This court not find that Court below committed any illegality or legal infirmity in holding that consent given in divorce by mutual consent can be withdrawn by one of parties before Court grants a decree of divorce by mutual consent – When consent by one of parties is withdrawn Court cannot pass a decree of divorce by mutual consent.
Result: Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Harindra Prasad, learned counsel for the sole respondent.
2. This first appeal has been filed by the appellant Smt. Poonam against the judgement and order dated 28.1.2017 passed by Family Court, Gorakhpur, by which Case No. 458 of 2014 (Rajiv Bariyani vs. Smt. Poonam) under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), has been dismissed on the ground that the respondent Rajiv Bariyani has withdrawn his consent.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that since the parties have been living separately for the past seven years and the respondent, after giving his consent to divorce by mutual consent, had withdrawn the same after two and a half years, the Family Judge was not at all legally justified in dismissing the Case No. 458 of 2014 (Rajiv Bariyani vs. Smt. Poonam).
4. Per contra, Sri Harindra Prasad, learned counsel for the sole respondent by placing reliance upon a judgement rendered by the Apex Court in Smt. Sureshta Devi vs. Om Prakash reported in 1991 2 SCC 25 submitted that consent can be withdrawn by one of the parties any time before the Court passes a decree of divorce by mutual consent.
5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Since the facts of this case are not in dispute, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, we are deciding this appeal finally at the admission stage itself as per the High Court Rules.
7. In order to appreciate the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, it would be useful to extract Section 13-B of the Act.
Section 13B in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
13B. Divorce by mutual consent
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976)*, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnised and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree.]
8. Even the most superficial reading of sub-section (1) Section 13-B of the Act indicates that subject to the provisions of the Act, a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
9. Sub-section (2) of Section 13-B of the Act further stipulates that on the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than 18 months after the said date and if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree.
10. There is nothing in Section 13-B of the Act which may indicate that the consent once given by either of the parties to a pe
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.