SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1059

K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, P. SATHASIVAM
SMRUTI PAHARIYA – Appellant
Versus
SANJAY PAHARIYA – Respondent


GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) THE wife, who is the appellant before this court, filed this appeal seeking to impugn the judgment and order dated 5. 6. 2008 passed by the High Court of judicature at bombay, which in a detailed judgment, was pleased to set aside the judgment and decree dated 5. 12. 2007 passed by the family Court, Mumbai, in which the Family court, dissolved the marriage between the appellant and the respondent by a decree of divorce on mutual consent under Section 13b of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter "the said Act" ).

( 3 ) ADMITTEDLY, the parties are Hindu and governed by the provisions of the said Act and they were married on 5. 3. 1993 at mumbai following the Hindu Vedic rites. Marriage was also registered. After marriage, the parties resided together in flat No. 601, 2nd Floor, Dinath Court, Sir pochkhanwala Road, Worli, Mumbai. Two sons were born to them, one on 1. 2. 1995 and the other one on 3. 4. 1997. A few years after that, serious differences and incompatibility surfaced between them and all attempts of settlement failed. The parties stopped living together from january 2005 and decided to file a petition seeking divorce by mutual cons





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top