RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Pooja – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The applicant, by means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the impugned order dated 18.01.2012, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Bulandshahar in Session Trial No. 579 of 2011, arising out of Case Crime No.175 of 2010, State Versus Madan and others, under Sections 302 and 201 I.P.C., Police Station Ahmedgarh, District Bulandshahar.
2. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicant is of no concern with offence of murder of Sonu. There is no connecting evidence against her. On the basis of her confessional statement, charge sheet has been filed, whereas prosecution version is that she was under illicit relation with Anil. It was witnessed by Sonu and Ganesh, who were residing with husband of applicant at his home. They protested this illicit relation. Applicant entered in conspiracy with Anil for getting rid from Ganesh and Sonu. In between, Anil was murdered, wherein Ganesh and Sonu were accused for offence of murder. Ganesh was detained in judicial custody. Sonu was subsequently
Dhanlakshmi v. R.Prasana Kumar
Shoraj Singh Ahlawat & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Anr; AIR 2013 SC 52
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Gaurishetty Mahesh
State of Bihar v. Murad Ali Khan
Palwinder Singh Vs. Balwinder Singh and others; (2008) 14 SCC 504
Monica Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Popular Muthiah v. State, Represented by Inspector of Police
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.