SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(All) 278

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Pooja – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shyam Babu Vaish, J.B. Kesharwani, Rama Shankar Mishra

JUDGMENT :

1. The applicant, by means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the impugned order dated 18.01.2012, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Bulandshahar in Session Trial No. 579 of 2011, arising out of Case Crime No.175 of 2010, State Versus Madan and others, under Sections 302 and 201 I.P.C., Police Station Ahmedgarh, District Bulandshahar.

2. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicant is of no concern with offence of murder of Sonu. There is no connecting evidence against her. On the basis of her confessional statement, charge sheet has been filed, whereas prosecution version is that she was under illicit relation with Anil. It was witnessed by Sonu and Ganesh, who were residing with husband of applicant at his home. They protested this illicit relation. Applicant entered in conspiracy with Anil for getting rid from Ganesh and Sonu. In between, Anil was murdered, wherein Ganesh and Sonu were accused for offence of murder. Ganesh was detained in judicial custody. Sonu was subsequently

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top