SHASHI KANT GUPTA, SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Anil Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHASHI KANT GUPTA, J.
1. The questions referred to this Bench for opinion are as follows:
(ii) Whether against the same judgment and order of acquittal in a complaint case, in a situation when victim and complainant both are different persons, victim may file appeal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC before the Sessions Judge or such appeal shall lie before the High Court ?
2. Since the learned Single Judge could not subscribe to the views expressed by the learned Single Judges of this Court in Criminal Misc. Application (Under Section 482 Cr.P.C) No. 5934 of 2012, Ashok Kumar Srivastava and others vs. State of UP and another, (decided on 30.03.2012) and Criminal Revision No. 3539 of 2015, Ved Prakash Yadav and 2 others Vs. State of UP and 2 others, (decided on 24.09.2015), referred the matter to a larger bench for resolving the conflict, the Chief Justi
Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. 2010 CrLJ 2860
Subhash Chand Vs. State (Delhi Administration)(2013) 2 SCC 17
Bhavuben Dineshbhai Makwana Vs. State of Gujarat
The Central India Spinning and Weaving Manufacturing Comp. versus The Municipal Committee
Girdhari Lal & Sons versus Balbir Nath Mathur 1986(2) SCC 237
K.P. Varghese V. ITO (1981) 4 SCC 173
State Bank of Travancore v. Mohd. M. Khan
Som Prakash Rekhi V. Unioin of India
Govindlal v. Agricultural Produce Market Committee
Babaji Kondaji v. Nasik Merchants Coop Bank Ltd. (1984) 2 SCC 50
Eera (through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf) v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr. 2017(15) SCC 133
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.