MADAN B.LOKUR, DEEPAK GUPTA
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Madan B. Lokur, J.
Leave granted.
2. The rights of victims of crime is a subject that has, unfortunately, only drawn sporadic attention of Parliament, the judiciary and civil society. Yet, it has made great progress over the years. It is our evolving and developing jurisprudence that has made this possible. But we still have a long way to go to bring the rights of victims of crime to the centre stage and to recognise them as human rights and an important component of social justice and the rule of law.
3. The travails and tribulations of victims of crime begin with the trauma of the crime itself and, unfortunately, continue with the difficulties they face in something as simple as the registration of a First Information Report (FIR). The difficulties in registering an FIR have been noticed by a Constitution Bench of this Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, (2014) 2 SCC 1. The ordeal continues, quite frequently, in the investigation that may not necessarily be unbiased, particularly in respect of crimes against women and children. Access to justice in terms of affordability, effective legal aid and advice as well as adequate and equal representation are als
Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh
Girish Kumar Suneja v. Central Board of Investigation
Bodhisattwa Gautam v. Subhra Chakroborty
Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra
Sampurna Behura v. Union of India
National Commission for Women v. State of Delhi
Parmeshwar Mandal v. State of Bihar
Satya Pal Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Garikapati Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhry
Satya Pal Singh v. State of M.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.