IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Shri 1008 Parshvanath Digamber Jain Mandir Samiti And Another - Appellant
Versus
The State of UP And Others - Respondent
WRIT-C No. 29840 of 2019
Decided On : 08-11-2019
Societies Registration Act - Registration of Society - 2, 3 - The court discussed the provisions of Sections 2 and 3 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, which outline the requirements for the registration of a society and the powers of the Registrar to issue public notice and consider objections before registering a society. The court also highlighted the legal effect of registration of a society under the Act, emphasizing that it grants the society the status of a legal entity apart from its members.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought registration of their society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The Deputy Registrar rejected their application citing a dispute over the management of the society and ownership of its properties.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that a civil suit was pending between rival factions claiming registration under the Act, and concluded that it was not appropriate to grant registration to either party until the suit was resolved.
Issues: Dispute over society management and property ownership, rejection of registration applications, pending civil suit between rival factions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Registrar has the discretion to issue public notice and consider objections before registering a society. It also emphasized that registration of a society under the Act grants it the status of a legal entity apart from its members.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as the court found no material error in the Deputy Registrar's decision to reject the registration applications.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Lakshmi Kant Trigunait, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Mata Prasad, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents.
2. The present petition seeks to challenge the order dated 11.07.2019 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Firms Societies and Chits Meerut Region, Meerut in terms of which, the application filed by the petitioners for registering it as a society under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860[the Act, 1860] has been rejected. Further, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the respondents for consideration of the claim of the petitioners pertaining to registration of the Society.
3. The facts of the case as reflected from the pleadings of the writ petition indicate that an application bearing application No.10001114 dated 07.05.2018 was submitted before the respondent No.4 seeking registration of the petitioner No.1 as a society under the Act, 1860. It has also been stated that the other procedural formalities such as submission of the copy of the memorandum of association and the list of the managing body of the society had been completed and requisite fee was also deposited. It is stated that a public notice was issued by the respondent No.4 inviting objections with regard to the application filed by the petitioners for registration of the Society and thereafter the order dated 11.07.2019 has been passed rejecting the claim of the petitioners for grant of registration under the Act 1860 for the reason that there existed a dispute with regard to the management of the Society.
4. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the present writ petition has been filed.
5. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the application for registering the Society having been duly submitted after completion of all the necessary procedural requirements including the submission of memorandum of association, the list of members of the managing Committee and also deposition of the requisite fee, the respondent No.4 could not have refused to register the society. It is submitted that there existed no dispute pertaining to the Society and that the dispute which was sought to be raised by one person, namely, Harish Kumar Jain has nothing to do with the affairs of the Society. It is also sought to be contended that the petitioners having filed the application seeking registration on 07.05.2018 which is prior in time to the application dated 19.09.2018 submitted by the rival contenders the claim of the petitioners for registration of the society ought to have been considered.
6. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents has supported the order passed by the Deputy Registrar by submitting that as there existed a dispute with regard to the Society in question the Deputy Registrar has rightly rejected the application filed by the petitioners for grant of registration of the Society under the Act, 1860 .
7. In order to appreciate the rival contentions, the relevant provisions with regard to registration of a society under the Act, 1860 may be referred to. For ease of reference Sections 2 and 3 of the Act, 1860 are being extracted below:
the object of the society;
the names, addresses and occupations of the governors, council, directors, committee, or other governing body to whom, by the rules of the society, the management of its affairs is entrusted.
A copy of the rules and regulations of the society, certified to be a correct copy by not less than three of the members of the governing body, shall be filed with the memorandum of association.
3. Registration and fees:- (1) Upon such memorandum and certified copy being filed along with particulars of the address of the Society's office which shall be its registered address, by the Secretary of the Society on behalf of the persons subscribing to the m
Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd. v. Corpn. of Calcutta AIR 1965 SC 1728
C.C.T. Vs. Jhaver Ramkishan Shrikishan
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. Vs. Tarun Pal Singh & Ors. (2018) 14 SCC 161
Ishverlal Thakorelal Almaula Vs. Motibhai Nagjibhai
Shah Bhojraj Kuverji Oil Mills & Ginning Factory Vs. Subbash Chandra Yograj Sinha
S. Sundaram Pillai & Ors. Vs. V.R. Pattabiraman & Ors.
State of Rajasthan Vs. Leela Jain
Shah Bhojraj Kuverji Oil Mills & Ginning Factory v. Subbash Chandra Yograj Sinha AIR 1961 SC 1596
Madras and Southern Mahratta Railway Company Ltd. Vs. Bezwada Municipality
Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao Vs. Ashalata S. Guram
South India Corpn. (P) Ltd. v. Secretary, Board of Revenue, Trivandrum AIR 1964 SC 207
State of Bihar and others Vs. Bihar Rajya M.S.E.S.K.K. Mahasangh and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.