SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(All) 365

BALA KRISHNA NARAYANA, SHAMIM AHMED
Shalini Massey – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Samuel Dass – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vashishtha Narayan Tripathi

JUDGNENT :

1. This application has been moved on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to condone the delay in filing this appeal before this Court.

2. The delay condonation application is supported by an affidavit of the defendant/appellant Shalini Massey.

3. We have perused the delay condonation application as well as the affidavit filed in support thereof.

4. We find that the cause shown for delay in filing this appeal in paragraph nos. 5 and 6 of the affidavit accompanying the delay condonation application is sufficient.

5. The delay condonation application is allowed. The delay in filing this appeal is condoned.

6. Office is directed to allot regular number to this appeal.

(By the Court)

1. Heard Sri Vashishtha Narayan Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellant.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.10.2019 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No. 2, Kanpur Nagar in Case No. 1973 of 2019 (Shalini Massey Vs. Neeraj Samuel Dass) under Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), by which application 6-x jointly moved by the defendant/appellant and the plaintiff/respondent before him with a prayer for waiving the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top