J.J.MUNIR
Ram Dei – Appellant
Versus
Joint Director of Consolidation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition questions a non-concurrent determination of objections under Section 9-A(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (for short, the Act) by the Consolidation Authorities.
2. The objections were brought by the petitioner, Ram Dei, since deceased and represented by her LRs, against one Smt. Sona Kunwar, represented before this Court by Ramji Tiwari, since deceased. Ramji Tiwari, original respondent no. 3 to this writ petition, is now represented by his heirs and legal representatives, substituted pendente lite. The objections also sought relief against respondent nos.4 and 5, that is to say, Jagardev Tiwari and Mukhdev Tiwari. Both these respondents have died pending this petition and are represented by their heirs and legal representatives. Before this Court, the claim of the petitioner is confined to the interest of Ramji Tiwari in terms more fully set out hereinafter. So far as respondent nos.4 and 5 are concerned, it appears that parties have buried the hatchet and are at peace with the way the event has gone before the Authorit
Ajit Savant Majagvai v. State of Karnataka
Asiatic Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. v. Sub- Lt. Arabinda Chakravarti
Bhagwati Prasad v. Chandramaul, (1966) 2 SCR 286
Biswanath Sahu and others vs. Mrs. Tribeni Mohan (dead) by L.R.s and others
Hardev Singh vs. Gurmail Singh (dead) By LRs
Jharu Ram Roy vs. Kamjit Roy and others
Madhusudan Das vs. Narayanibai (Deceased) by LRs and others
Mahipat Missir and others vs. Ganpat Sah and others
Ram Sarup Gupta vs. Bishun Narain Inter College
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.