RAJNISH KUMAR
Sahab Deen – Appellant
Versus
Keshav Prasad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard, Shri Angrej Nath Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Mohammad Arif khan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ram Dev Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This second appeal has been filed for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 27.01.2017 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.27 of 2014 by the learned Additional District Judge/Special Judge (A.P.) CBI, Lucknow as well as the judgment and decree dated 18.10.2002 passed in Regular Suit No.64 of 1999 (Sahab Deen Vs. Keshav Prasad and Others) by the learned Civil Judge, (J.D), Hawali, Lucknow
3. The brief facts of the case are that the land in question i.e. gata no.216 having an area of 9 Bigha, 12 Biswa, 9 Biswansi situated in Village-Bhaisora, Pargana, Tehsil and District-Lucknow was purchased by the appellant/plaintiff from his father-in-law on 21.02.1998. Thereafter he instituted a case for mutation before the Tehsil. His father-in-law, under the influence of his other son-in-laws, demanded additional money. When the appellant/plaintiff showed his inability to pay the additional money, the brother-in-laws of the appellant/plaintiff i.e. the son-in-laws of his father-in-law namely
Alka Gupta Vs. Narender Kumar Gupta
Arjan Singh Vs. Punit Ahluwalia and Others
Balraj Taneja and Another Vs. Sunil Madan and Another
Ishwar Dass Jain (Dead) Through LR's Vs. Sohan Lal (Dead) By LR's
Sham Lal (Dead) By Lrs. Vs. Atme Nand Jain Sabha (Regd.) Dal Bazar
ShantiLal Gulabchand Mutha Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Limited and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.