SIDDHARTHA VARMA
Jaikaran Singh – Appellant
Versus
Balakram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 4.10.2019 by which the District Judge Ghaziabad had refused to interfere in the Transfer Application filed by the petitioner. A further prayer in the application is that the Civil Appeal No. 8 of 2019, Balakram and Others vs. Jaikaran Singh and Others, be Transferred from the Court of 4th Additional District Judge, Ghaziabad, to any other Court of the judgeship of Ghaziabad.
2. Even before notices could be issued to the respondents, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel Sri. Neeraj Upadhyay opposed the filing of the instant application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, before entering into the merits of the case, the Counsel were heard with regard to the maintainability of the application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon Sunita Devi vs. Ram Kripal and Another, (2015) 2 AWC 1543 and submitted that an application when was rejected by the District Court under Section 24 of the C.P.C. a further application under Section 24 of the C.P.C. was not maintaina
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.