SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(All) 582

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J.
Virendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar and others – Respondents
First Appeal From Order No. 78 of 2011
Decided On : 08-05-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : B.P. Verma, Mayank
For the Respondent: S.C. Srivastava

Point of Law:
If the victim of the accident suffers permanent disability, then efforts should always be made to award adequate compensation not only for the physical injury and treatment, but also for the loss of earning and his inability to lead a normal life and enjoy amenities, which he would have enjoyed but for the disability caused due to the accident.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 173 – Compensation – Present appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed by appellant, being aggrieved by judgment and order passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court in Motor Accident Claim Petition awarding a sum of amount for expenses incurred towards medicines and treatment of injuries sustained by appellant in a motor accident, alongwith 6% interest from date of filing of claim petition till date of payment of compensation – Held, Appellant/claimant was a pillion rider aged 45 years, earning Rs.8000/- per month – His permanent disability is assessed at 50% and his services were dispensed with – His chances of getting any other employment was bleak and even if he got any job, the salary was likely to be a pittance – Court assessed his loss of future earning capacity as 50%. – It should be 9% in view decision of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal decided which is the latest in point of time – Appeal Allowed (Paras 29, 31, 32)

Facts of the Case:

Claimant aged 45 years filed MAC No.239 of 2008 against the driver & owner of the vehicle and the insurance company before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No.7, Mathura claiming a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- along with 12% interest in respect of the injuries suffered by him in the motor accident.

Finding of the Court:

Appellant/claimant was a pillion rider aged 45 years, earning Rs.8000/- per month – His permanent disability is assessed at 50% and his services were dispensed with – His chances of getting any other employment was bleak and even if he got any job, the salary was likely to be a pittance – Court assessed his loss of future earning capacity as 50%. – It should be 9% in view decision of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal decided which is the latest in point of time.

Result: Appeal Allowed

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri B.P. Verma, learned counsel for the claimant-appellant and Shri S.C. Srivastava, learned counsel for the insurance company.

2. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed by the appellant, being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 21.9.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court no.7, Mathura in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.239 of 2008 (Virendra Kumar vs. Vijay Kumar and others) awarding a sum of Rs.62,866/- for the expenses incurred towards medicines and treatment of the injuries sustained by the appellant in a motor accident, alongwith 6% interest from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of payment of compensation.

3. The claimant aged 45 years filed MAC No.239 of 2008 against the driver & owner of the vehicle and the insurance company before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No.7, Mathura claiming a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- along with 12% interest in respect of the injuries suffered by him in the motor accident alleged to have occurred on 17.2.2008 around 12.30 p.m.

4. The claim petition was filed stating therein that on 17.2.2008 at about 12.30 PM the claimant was going alongwith his friend Goverdhan Singh on a motorcycle No.UP-85-R-5810 from Mathura to Farah when the driver of the Qualis Vehicle No.HR-70-7263 while driving the vehicle rashly and negligently hit the said motorcycle from behind on N.H.2 near village Mahuvan, damaging the motorcycle and causing serious injuries to the driver Goverdhan Singh as well as the pillion rider-claimant. Regarding the said accident the first information report was lodged at the concerned police station. The claimant-appellant was treated for injuries first at Lifeline Hospital, Mathura where he was under treatment from 17.2.2008 to 18.2.2008. Subsequently, when his condition was deteriorating, he was admitted to Loknayak Hospital, Delhi and he was admitted there from 19.4.2008 to 6.5.2008. During the treatment many operations were performed on his body and he was given 6 bottles blood. Due to the accident the claimant-appellant suffered serious physical and mental agony. On account of the injuries caused in the said accident the appellant suffered permanent physical disability. Before the accident the appellant was working as Guard at Toll Plaza near Mathura Mahuvan/Barari and getting salary of Rs.4,000/- per month. He also used to earn Rs.4000/- from agricultural activities at his village. In this manner, Rs.10,00,000/- was claimed along with 12% interest.

5. The opposite party no. 3-insurance company filed its written statement and contested the claim of the claimant on various grounds. Despite service of notices, neither the opposite party nos.1 and 2 (driver and owner of the offending vehicle) appear in the proceedings nor file any written statement. In such situation, the proceedings was conducted ex-parte against them vide order dated 28.7.2009. The driver of the motorcycle also held to be guilty of contributory negligence and as such, he also contributed to the accident to the extent of 20%. Finally, the Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.46,866 towards medical expenses; Rs.5000/- towards pain and suffering; Rs.3000/- towards conveyance; Rs.3000/- towards attendant charges and Rs.5000/- towards special diet. In this manner, the claimant-appellant was made entitled to receive a compensation of Rs.46,866 + 5000+ 3000 + 3000 + 5000, total compensation Rs.62,866/- alongwith 6% interest from the date of filing the claim petition till the date of payment.

6. Learned counsel for the appellant urged at the time of the hearing that the claimant-appellant claimed compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for the injuries caused in the accident but the Claims Tribunal had awarded the compensation of Rs.62,866/- only towards medical expe

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top