ANIL KUMAR, VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAV
Tulsi Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
This is the second bail application while the first bail application has been rejected vide order dated 20.07.2016.
2. The appellant has been convicted by judgment and order dated 17.01.2013 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Court No. 7, Sitapur in Sessions Trial No. 885/2010 arising out of Case Crime No. 149/2010, under Sections-498-A, 302, I.P.C., relating to Police Station-Mahmodabad, District Sitapur.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant while pressing the bail application moved on behalf of the appellant-applicant submits that appellant-accused is in jail nearly 9 years and there is no likelihood that the appeal may be heard in near future.
4. So taking into consideration the said facts as well as the fact that the PW-1, the author of the F.I.R. the father of the deceased in his statement stated that on the date of incident, the appellant-accused is working with him in his field and after hearing news of death, he along with him went to the place where deceased was found dead. So taking into consideration the said facts, he may be enlarged on bail.
5. Learned A.G.A. whi
Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
Gaudikanti Narasimhulu v. State
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565 : 1980 SCC (Cri) 465 : AIR 1980 SC 1632
Gurcharan Singh v. State (UT of Delhi)
Maneka Gandhi V. Union of India
Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.