SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(All) 469

D. S. MATHUR
Rameshwar – Appellant
Versus
Ram Asrey – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
G.P. Dikshit, For the Appellant / V.B. Khare, For the Respondent

ORDER

D.S. Mathur, J. - This is a revision u/s 115 CPC by Rameshwar, Defendant, against the order dated 15.4.1963 of the Addl. Munsif, Gorakhpur, holding that the present suit for injunction was cognizable by the civil court.

2. Ram Asrey son of Tapesar, Plaintiff opposite party, had instituted the present suit for a perpetual injunction to restrain the Defendant, Rameshwar, from interfering with his possession over plot No. 263/1, area 0.63 acres, of village Kharkharaiva. In the alternative, it was prayed that if the Plaintiff be found not to be in possession of the land, possession be given to him after dispossession of the Defendant. The alternative relief was, however, got deleted at a subsequent stage and the plaint as it at present stands, is for a perpetual injunction to restrain the Defendant from interfering with the possession of the Plaintiff over the agricultural plot in dispute.

3. The suit was instituted on 11.4. 1962 after the amendment of S. 331 of the UPZA and LR Act under UP Act No. XXVIII ;of 1961. As a result of this amendment the civil court cannot take cognizance of a suit, application or proceeding based on a cause of action in respect of which any relief can be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top