DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Rameshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.
This criminal revision under Section 397/401 CrPC has been filed against the judgment and order dated 16th December, 2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act), Unnao in Sessions Trial No.156 of 2004 by means of which the learned Sessions Judge has acquitted the accused-respondent nos. 2 to 8 (Rajjan Singh, Guddu Singh, Raj Kumar Singh, Uttam Singh, Udham Singh, Madal Singh and Parashuram Singh) of the charges under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with Sections 149 and 201 IPC and the accused-respondent, Bhola Singh of the charge under Section 120-B IPC.
2. An FIR at Case Crime No. 501 of 2003 was registered under Sections 147, 148, 302, 201 and 120-B IPC At Police Station Hasanganj, District Unnao against eight accused on a written complaint of Rameshwar Singh, son of Late Guru Prasad Singh (PW-2). The allegations in the complaint were that the complainant was resident of Village Tala Sarai, District Unnao and when the incident took place, he was living at Village Jawan, Police Station Auras, District Unnao. On 26.10.2003, he along with his brother-in-law Ahibaran Singh came to village Jawan to meet his brothers on the occasion
Bakhshish Singh vs. State of Punjab and another
Jagdish Prasad vs. State of M.P.
Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary case
Raj Kumar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
Ram Briksh Singh and others vs. Ambika Yadav and another
Sampath Kumar v.Inspector of Police
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.