SUNITA AGARWAL
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The challenge in the present petition is to order of rejection of claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment. The reason given therein is that the scheme of compassionate appointment was not available in the Bank on the date of death of the employee, i.e. father of the petitioner.
3. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner's father who was working as Accounts Officer with the respondent Bank had died on 12.5.2018. As the salary of the petitioner's father was the only source of income of the family, the petitioner's mother moved an application dated 8.4.2019 for grant of compassionate appointment to the petitioner herein with the consent of all other dependants of the deceased employee. The prayer of the petitioner's mother had wrongly been rejected by the order impugned though the scheme of compassionate appointment was available in the Bank, w.e.f 15.3.2019.
4. It is contended that on demand of the employees of the Public Sector Banks, the Government of India had approved the scheme of compassionate appointment and a communication dated 7.8.2014 was sent t
Bhawani Prasad Sonkar vs. Union of India and others
Canara Bank and another vs. M. Mahesh
Deepal Girishbhai Soni & ors. vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Baroda
MGB Gramin Bank vs Chakrawarti Singh
Official Liquidator vs. Dayanand & ors.
Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Trichur vs. Ramanuja Match Industries
State Bank of India and others vs Sheo Shankar Tewari
State of Bihar vs. Upendra Narayan Singh & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.