SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 2566

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel, Piyush Agrawal, JJ.
Support India Welfare Society – Petitioner
Versus
State of U P And Others – Respondents
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 1474 of 2019
Decided On : 16-09-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shree Prakash Giri
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Shyam Mani Shukla, Suresh C. Dwivedi

Point of Law: Protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wild life.— The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country

Headnote:

Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 – Sections 18, 9 – U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 – U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 – Constitution of India – Articles 21, 51-A(g) – Registered Society Issue – Public Interest Litigation - “Support India Welfare Society” – effect to fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution and has held that if those rights are violated by disturbing the environment, it can award damages not only for the restoration of the ecological balance - In order to protect “life”, in order to protect “environment” and in order to protect “air, water and soil” from pollution, this Court through its various judgments has given effect to the rights available, to the citizens and persons alike, under Article 21 of the Constitution

Facts of the Case:

Public Interest Litigation is in respect of illegal encroachments over pond over Plot Nos. 253 & 254 situated at Village – Rajpur, Tehsil & District – Agra by the land mafias in collusion with the local officials. The said plots are intended to be used for the construction of multi-storey building by the powerful and influential persons of the city. It is stated that in the District – Agra, the land mafias are indulged in encroachments of the public utility land, particularly, ponds/water bodies. The petitioner has brought on the record a copy of the revenue record to demonstrate that Plot Nos. 253 & 254 are recorded as pond (Pokhar

Finding of the Court:

court make it clear that any negligence in compliance of the orders of the Supreme Court and this order shall be treated as a negligence of duty and appropriate action shall be taken against the concerned Officer(s) under the relevant Service Rules – Court is constrained to issue these directions having regard to the fact that after lapse of 18 years, the State functionaries have not complied with the directions of the Supreme Court as well as this Court – The District Magistrate, Agra is directed to issue the necessary directions for the restoration of the pond to its original shape and a compliance report be filed to the Registrar General within three months – The Registrar General shall place it on the record –

Result: Public Interest Litigation Disposed

JUDGMENT :

1. This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been instituted by the petitioner, who claims to be the Chairman of the Legal Cell of the registered Society, “Support India Welfare Society”. One of the objects of the Society is to take up the cause of public importance for its redressal for the marginal sections of the society.

2. The grievance raised in this Public Interest Litigation is in respect of illegal encroachments over pond over Plot Nos. 253 & 254 situated at Village – Rajpur, Tehsil & District – Agra by the land mafias in collusion with the local officials. The said plots are intended to be used for the construction of multi-storey building by the powerful and influential persons of the city. It is stated that in the District – Agra, the land mafias are indulged in encroachments of the public utility land, particularly, ponds/water bodies. The petitioner has brought on the record a copy of the revenue record to demonstrate that Plot Nos. 253 & 254 are recorded as pond (Pokhar).

3. It is stated that the petitioner had made several representations to the concerned authorities and when no action was taken, the petitioner filed Public Interest Litigation No. 4502 of 2018, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 4th October, 2018, directing the District Magistrate, Agra to take appropriate action, in accordance with law.

4. Pursuant to the order of this Court, the petitioner submitted a detailed representation on 22/27th October, 2018 before the District Magistrate, Agra. The District Magistrate, Agra directed to conduct an inquiry and it was found that Plot Nos. 253 area 0.1150 hectare has been encroached upon by the RCL Public School and a direction was issued to the Nagar Nigam, Agra for the removal of the encroachment and to restore the pond. It is stated that in spite of the order of the District Magistrate, Agra dated 6th May, 2019, no effective step has been taken for the removal of the encroachment. The petitioner has brought on the record some of the documents to indicate that the encroachment still exist.

5. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the State.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Supreme Court, in a large number of judgments, has issued directions to all the Chief Secretaries of the States for removal of the encroachments from the water bodies. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Hinch Lal Tiwari Vs. Kamala Devi & Others, (2001) 6 SCC 496, Jagpal Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors., AIR 2011 SC 1123, Jagat Narain And Others Vs. State of U.P. And Others, 2015 (3) ADJ 466 (DB), and P.S. Shisodia Vs. Board of Revenue Alld., 2008 (1) R.D. 15..

7. This Court also, following the judgments of the Supreme Court, has issued directions to the authorities for the compliance of the judgments of the Supreme Court.

8. It is apposite at this stage to set out the relevant statutory provisions contained in Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 and the executive orders, which deals with the Ponds/water bodies in this state.

“Section 4: Vesting of estates in the State:- (1) As soon as may be after the commencement of this Act the State Government may, by notification, declare that as from a date to be specified, all estates situate in Uttar Pradesh shall vest in the State and, as from the beginning of the date so specified (hereinafter called the date of vesting), all such estates shall stand transferred to and vest, except as hereinafter provided, in the State free from all encumbrances.

(2) It shall be lawful for the State Government, if it so considers necessary, to issue, from time to time, the notification referred to in sub-section (1) in respect only of such area or areas as may be specified and all the provisions of sub-section (1) shall be applicable to and in the case of every such notification.

117. Vesting of certain lands, etc. in Gaon Sabhas and other l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top