SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Babloo – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Rahul Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent and Sri Ujjwal Satsangi holding brief of Sri Kartikeya Saran, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying to quash the advertisement dated 20.03.2020, the order dated 16.03.2020 passed by the Mandi Secretary, Agra and the order dated 26.02.2020 passed by the allotment committee with the approval of the District Magistrate, Agra.
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the bids were invited pursuant to a tender notice after publication in daily newspapers for open auction of 43 shops for allotment at Mandi Sthal Barauli Ameer, Agra. In respect of the seven shops reserved for scheduled castes, only five firms, including the petitioner, submitted their bids. The petitioner submitted a bid of Rs. 16,15,000/in the name of his concern M/s K.G.N. Trading Company. The Allotment Committee, upon considering that the number of applicants was less and competitive bids were not submitted, which had resulted in the bids having been submitted for lesser amount, took a decision not to accept the highest bids submitted in r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.