SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(All) 1198

SANGEETA CHANDRA
Binni Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi
For the Respondent: C.S.C. and Komal Prasad Tiwari

ORDER :

Sangeeta Chandra, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sandeep Dixit, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Komal Prasad Tiwari for respondent no. 4 and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. Writ Petition No. 3139 (MS) of 2020 has been filed challenging the order dated 13.1.2020 passed by the Tehsildar, Sadar, Lucknow and praying for a mandamus to be issued to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to enquire into the conduct of respondent no. 3 in not only passing the impugned order in respect of the village, which is not under his jurisdiction but also for keeping the application for certified copy of the impugned order pending before him without any rhyme and reason, and also for a direction to the respondents to take necessary steps so that the nature and status of the land of the petitioner being Gata No. 4Sa, area 0.5675 hectare situated in Village Muzaffarnagar Ghuswal, Pargana Bijnore, Tehsil Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow is protected and preserved from illegal and forceful occupation of respondent no. 4.

3. Writ Petition No. 3140 (MS) of 2020 has been filed by the petitioner challenging the orders dated 14.1.2020 and 31.8.2019 passed by the Su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top