SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(All) 1283

SANGEETA CHANDRA
Ram Narain – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. , District Barabanki – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ram Kumar Singh and Vinay Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

ORDER :

Sangeeta Chandra, J.

1. This petition has been filed praying for quashing of the order dated 30.07.2019 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation Barabanki in Reference No. 415: Ram Narain & Others vs. Tej Bahadur and others, under Section 48(3) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and also for quashing of the order dated 30.01.2016 passed in Case No. 178/403/219/133/2016: Lauhar Prasad and others vs. Tej Bahadur and others, under Section 28 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act.

2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the father of the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 was the original tenure holder of the land of Gata No. 467/1277 (Old No. 255/1) area 5-7-0 situated at village Mahulara, Pargana Suryapur, Tehsil Ram Sanehi Ghat, District Barabanki. The father of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, namely, Molhe executed a sale deed on 30.01.1992 in favour of respondent Nos. 3 to 6 as well as one Mansa Ram-the husband of respondent No. 7, by means of which he transferred an area of 8 Biswa only to the private respondents.

On the basis of the such registered sale deed, mutation orders were passed on 30.12.1993. It is evident from the sale deed that the land which was so

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top