Manish Jain vs State of U. P. - 2021 Supreme(All) 134

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(All) 134

K.J.THAKER, GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Manish Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ranjit Saxena, Mahabir Yadav, Ram Awtar, Subhash Singh Yadav, Y.S. Saxena.
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate, Anurag Shukla.

JUDGMENT :

Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J.

1. Heard Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned Advocate for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 28/30.7.2015 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Agra in Sessions Trial No.280 of 2012 convicting appellant under Section 452, 307 & 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and Section 4/5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (for short 'Act, 1908'). The learned Additional Sessions Judge has sentenced the accused in the following manner and has held that all the sentences to run concurrently:

Conviction under Section	Sentence Awarded	Fine	Default Sentence
302 of I.P.C.	Life imprisonment	5000/-	6 months
307 of I.P.C.	7 years	1000/-	1 month
452 of I.P.C.	3 years	500/-	15 days
4/5 of Explosive Substances Act	10 years	1000/-	1 month

3. On the fateful day when grand daughter was born to dau

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(All) 134

K.J.THAKER, GAUTAM CHOWDHARYManish Jain – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

K.J.THAKER, GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Manish Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent