SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(SC) 346

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.K. MATHEW AND N.L. UNTWALIA JJ.
Sudershan Kumar, Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 54 of 1971, D/- 30-10-1974.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302, 304 Par I or Section 326Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 342 - Post-mortem examination – Offence of Murder – Death - Both mother and daughter had taken to profession of dancing and singing and used to live in an apartment on G. B. Road - Accused had illicit connection with Maya Devi and he often used to go to resident of deceased- accused wanted to marry but she declined as he was already married to another woman - A few days before occurrence appellant took with him to his house and she stayed there for about days – There after was brought back by accused to her mother apartment - On that occasion also accused asked Maya Devi to marry him but she refused - Accused then threatened that if she would not marry him she should either leave or he would kill her in such a manner that she would have lingering death - On August at about was lying on her cot with her son aged about one month was lying on another cot in same room – Held, Where death is caused by bodily injury person who causes such bodily injury shall be deemed to have caused death although by resorting to proper remedies and skillful treatment death might have been prevented - Argument of counsel that accused only intended to disfigure Maya Devi and not to cause her death overlooks evidence of that appellant threatened that if she did not marry him she will have a lingering death and also evidence furnished by dying declaration of that appellant threatened to kill or disfigure her with acid - Act of appellant in pouring acid on body was a pre-planned one and he intended to cause injury which he actually caused - Appeal dismissed

Judgement

MATHEW, J. : - When the special leave to appeal was granted, this Court limited it to the question of the nature of the offence committed by the appellant (accused) in causing the death of one Maya Devi by pouring acid on her body.

2. The prosecution case was as follows. Maya Devi aged 19 years at the time of her death was the daughter of Raj Kumari (P. W. 1). Both the mother and daughter had taken to the profession of dancing and singing and used to live in an apartment on G. B. Road, Delhi. The accused had illicit connection with Maya Devi and he often used to go to the resident of the deceased. The accused wanted to marry Maya Devi but she declined as he was already married to another woman. A few days before the occurrence, the appellant took Maya Devi with him to his house and she stayed there for about 12 days. Thereafter Maya Devi was brought back by the accused to her mother s apartment. On that occasion also the accused asked Maya Devi to marry him but she refused. The accused then threatened Maya Devi that if she would not marry him, she should either leave Delhi or he would kill her in such a manner that she would have lingering death. On August 14, 1967, at about 6 A. M., Maya Devi was lying on her cot with her son aged about one month. Raj Kumari was lying on another cot in the same room. The accused came to the room holding a jug containing acid and a bottle. The accused the poured the acid out of the jug on Maya Devi, her son and Raj Kumari. They started crying and the accaused threw the jug on the cot and placed the bottle on the ground and ran away. Maya Devi was thereafter removed to the City Clinic, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi a private hospital at about 6.30 A. M. Raj Kumari and the son of Maya Devi were also taken to the hospital. They were examined by Dr. V. K. Jain. He found that Maya Devi had extensive injuries on her person. The doctor found that there were a few streaks and patches of acid burns on the right arm and forearm of Raj Kumari. Acid burns were also found on the scalp of the child of Maya Devi.

3. After getting first aid from the City Clinic, Raj Kumari went to the Police Station Kamla Market and lodged the F. I. R. at 8.30 A. M. the Assistant Sub-Inspector Surjit Singh went to the city Clinic and found Maya Devi lying in a precarious condition. She was not in a position to give any statement. On August 16, 1967, the Assistant Sub-Inspector went to the clinic and with the permission of Dr. Jain recorded the statement of Maya Devi in which she stated that it was the accused who had thrown acid on her, her mother and her son on the 14th morning.

4. After August 16, 1967, Maya Devi started having toxaemia and infection of the burns. It was therefore, though better to transfer her to the Special Burns Unit in Safdarjang Hospital. Accordingly on August 21, 1967, Maya Devi was admitted in the Safdarjang Hospital at about 9 P. M. She was treated in that Hospital by Dr. K. S. Raj Kumar, House Surgeon and Dr. (Miss) Nirmala Lakshmi Narain. On August 23, 1967, Shri V. N. Chaturvedi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hauz Qazi, went to Safdarjang Hospital and recorded the statement of Maya Devi. In that statement also she stated that the accused had thrown acid on her mother and son on the morning of August 14, 1967. Maya Devi died in Safdarjang Hospital at 2.50 A. M. on August 26, 1967. The usual inquest report was prepared and the dead body was sent to the mortuary. Post-mortem examination of the dead body was performed by Dr. S. S, Kaushal on August 26, 1967 at 6 P. M.

5. The accused in his statement under Section 342, Cr. P. C. said that he never wanted to marry Maya Devi, that she was living with him as his wife without any formal marriage, that he never threatened Maya Devi that in case she did not marry him he would kill her and that he did not go to the house of Maya Devi on the morning of August 14, 1967 with a jug and bottle of acid.

6. The learned Sessions Judge accepted the prosecution case and c



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top