SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 136

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
AJIT KUMAR, J.
Vijai Kumar @ Pyare Lal - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 2704 of 2012 Connected with Criminal Appeal No. 2803 of 2012
Decided On : 19-02-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : U.B. Singh.
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate, Ashish Pandey.

Headnote:(A) Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 27A, and 52-A - Appeals arising from conviction for possession of ganja - The trial court relied on confessions recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, which cannot be utilized as evidence due to non-compliance with procedural safeguards - The court held that key independent witnesses were not produced, leading to doubts on the recovery of contraband - Evidence raised cumulative doubts about the case, thus findings were not substantiated beyond reasonable doubt - Appeals allowed and convictions set aside. (Paras 1-80)

(B) The court ruled that confessions made under NDPS Act are inadmissible if officers recording them qualify as police officers under Section 25 Indian Evidence Act. (Para 16)

(C) Prosecution’s failure to comply with Section 52-A raises questions on procedural integrity regarding sampling and storage of contraband. (Paras 44-52)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were accused of smuggling ganja, allegedly recovered in a raid by the Narcotics Control Bureau, with evidence primarily resting on confessions claimed to have been made under the NDPS Act. Key independent witnesses were not examined in court, which raised issues about the credibility of the evidence and conviction.

Findings of Court:
The trial court’s convictions were overturned due to procedural lapses in collecting evidence and reliance on confessions that lacked corroboration and validity.

Issues: Main issues included the admissibility of confessional statements under Section 67, compliance with NDPS procedural guidelines, and whether the prosecution established possession and delivery of contraband beyond reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that reliance on unverified confessions and lack of corroborating evidence undermined the prosecution's burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Result: Appeals allowed and both appellants acquitted.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri D.S. Mishra, learned Advocate assisted by Sri U.B. Singh and Sri Chandrakesh Mishra, learned counsel for the respective appellants, Sri Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for the Narcotics Control Board and Sri B.A. Khan, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

2. These two above noted criminal appeals have been listed together under the order of this Court dated 20th August, 2019 as they arise out of common judgment dated 3rd July, 2012 passed in Sessions Trial No. 188 of 2003 (State v. Pyare Lal) under Section 8 /20/27A/29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 24/Special Judge, Allahabad. Accordingly both the appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

3. The prosecution case in the complaint is that on receiving information from some reliable confidential sources, Sri Kaushal Kant Mishra, an intelligence officer of the Narcotics Control Bureau Control, Varanasi landed at Allahabad on 2nd June, 2003 alongwith a team of officers at around 5:00 pm directly at the gate of M/s Gati Transport Private Ltd. a private transport service for carriage of goods and articles (for short transport company). At the very gate of Transport Company, he and his team happened to meet two persons namely, Mrinmay Das Gupta and Sandip Kumar Sharma, who claimed themselves to be employees of the Transport Company. The team of officers led by Mr. Mishra apprised these employees about the purpose of their arrival at Allahabad and persuaded them to be their witnesses, to which they readily agreed. Thus, having obtained their consent, the team alongwith those two witnesses reached at the spot where 20 plywood boxes were lying and they approached the person as well who was standing by side these boxes. Upon an enquiry, he told the team that his name is Vijay Kumar S/o Sukru Ram, a resident of police Station Nizamabad, district Azamgarh and upon further enquiry from him, he informed them that these 20 boxes were full of Ganja (fruiting top of Cannabis plant), a psychotropic substance. He admitted that these boxes belonged to one Vinod Singh S/o Shiv Nath Singh a resident of village Ronwa, Post Fariha P.S. Nizamabad, District Azamgarh, who had asked him to get these boxes released and for that purpose he had been paid Rs. 14,969/- and was also having the papers to get these boxes released, and further that he was directed by said Vinod Singh to get these boxes delivered at his shop situate in Ronwa village. He also informed the team that he was waiting there for a proper carriage to get these boxes loaded for the desired destination. As usual, the officers asked Vijay Kumar that should he wanted these boxes and himself also to be searched in front of a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, he would be permitted to do so but he refused in writing for the same and authorized the officers of the team to carry out the search. The search was carried out on the spot and said Vijay Kumar also refused to get the independent witnesses to be searched prior to search being carried out. As agreed by Vijay Kumar, the search of 20 plywood boxes was undertaken and these boxes were found fully filled with brown colour leaves etc. and when they were tested on a testing tool kit, the team had carried with it, it was found to be ganja a psychotropic substance. On enquiry, Vijay Kumar admitted to have prior knowledge of psychotropic substance being there inside those boxes and admitted to have knowledge that he was carrying the contraband quite unauthorizedly and that it was a punishable offence under the Act, 1985, however, he claimed that he was doing so for a monthly payment of Rs. 2000/-. The boxes thus were emptied as the material was taken out of the boxes and was all weighed and it all turned out to be 630 Kg in weight. The entire material was kept in 22 jute bags and two sets of samples were collected of 25 grams each from each


    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top