IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
AJIT KUMAR, J.
Vijai Kumar @ Pyare Lal - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 2704 of 2012 Connected with Criminal Appeal No. 2803 of 2012
Decided On : 19-02-2021
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri D.S. Mishra, learned Advocate assisted by Sri U.B. Singh and Sri Chandrakesh Mishra, learned counsel for the respective appellants, Sri Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for the Narcotics Control Board and Sri B.A. Khan, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. These two above noted criminal appeals have been listed together under the order of this Court dated 20th August, 2019 as they arise out of common judgment dated 3rd July, 2012 passed in Sessions Trial No. 188 of 2003 (State v. Pyare Lal) under Section 8 /20/27A/29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 24/Special Judge, Allahabad. Accordingly both the appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.
3. The prosecution case in the complaint is that on receiving information from some reliable confidential sources, Sri Kaushal Kant Mishra, an intelligence officer of the Narcotics Control Bureau Control, Varanasi landed at Allahabad on 2nd June, 2003 alongwith a team of officers at around 5:00 pm directly at the gate of M/s Gati Transport Private Ltd. a private transport service for carriage of goods and articles (for short transport company). At the very gate of Transport Company, he and his team happened to meet two persons namely, Mrinmay Das Gupta and Sandip Kumar Sharma, who claimed themselves to be employees of the Transport Company. The team of officers led by Mr. Mishra apprised these employees about the purpose of their arrival at Allahabad and persuaded them to be their witnesses, to which they readily agreed. Thus, having obtained their consent, the team alongwith those two witnesses reached at the spot where 20 plywood boxes were lying and they approached the person as well who was standing by side these boxes. Upon an enquiry, he told the team that his name is Vijay Kumar S/o Sukru Ram, a resident of police Station Nizamabad, district Azamgarh and upon further enquiry from him, he informed them that these 20 boxes were full of Ganja (fruiting top of Cannabis plant), a psychotropic substance. He admitted that these boxes belonged to one Vinod Singh S/o Shiv Nath Singh a resident of village Ronwa, Post Fariha P.S. Nizamabad, District Azamgarh, who had asked him to get these boxes released and for that purpose he had been paid Rs. 14,969/- and was also having the papers to get these boxes released, and further that he was directed by said Vinod Singh to get these boxes delivered at his shop situate in Ronwa village. He also informed the team that he was waiting there for a proper carriage to get these boxes loaded for the desired destination. As usual, the officers asked Vijay Kumar that should he wanted these boxes and himself also to be searched in front of a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, he would be permitted to do so but he refused in writing for the same and authorized the officers of the team to carry out the search. The search was carried out on the spot and said Vijay Kumar also refused to get the independent witnesses to be searched prior to search being carried out. As agreed by Vijay Kumar, the search of 20 plywood boxes was undertaken and these boxes were found fully filled with brown colour leaves etc. and when they were tested on a testing tool kit, the team had carried with it, it was found to be ganja a psychotropic substance. On enquiry, Vijay Kumar admitted to have prior knowledge of psychotropic substance being there inside those boxes and admitted to have knowledge that he was carrying the contraband quite unauthorizedly and that it was a punishable offence under the Act, 1985, however, he claimed that he was doing so for a monthly payment of Rs. 2000/-. The boxes thus were emptied as the material was taken out of the boxes and was all weighed and it all turned out to be 630 Kg in weight. The entire material was kept in 22 jute bags and two sets of samples were collected of 25 grams each from each
Rajesh Jagdamba Avasthi v. State of Goa
Jitendra and Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madan Lal and another vs. State of H.P.
Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Rajasthan v. Sahi Ram
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu
Niramal Singh PehlwanSingh v. Inspector Customs
Kanhaiya Lal v. Union of India
Raj Kumar Karwal v. Union of India and others
Gian Chand and Others v. State of Haryana
Laxmibai (Dead) Thr. L.Rs. & Anr. v. Bhagwanthuva (Dead) Thr. L.Rs. & Ors.
Ravinder Kumar Sharma v. State of Assam & Ors.
Ghasita Sahu v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Rohtash Kumar v. State of Haryana
Madan Lal & Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Vijay Jain v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Dehal Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Dhanajaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka
State of Kerala and Others v. Kurian Abraham (P) Ltd. and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.