JUDGMENT :

Samit Gopal, J.

1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Chaurasia, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Praveen Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Ashwini Prakash Tripathi, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. As per the office report dated 21.08.2017, the lower court records which were summoned are tagged with the present revision, which have also been perused.

2. The present revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 20.05.2016 passed by the Family Court, Gorakhpur in Case No. 62 of 2005 (Smt. Sarika Vs. Shri Praveen Srivastava) by which the wife of the revisionist has been directed to be paid Rs. 10,000/-and Kumari Bhumika Srivastava, the daughter of the revisionist and the opposite party no.2 has been directed to be paid Rs. 5,000/-from the date of the order which will be effective from May, 2016 as maintenance.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionist argued that the order impugned is bad in law as the opposite party no.2 was living in adultery and the child born from her is not from his contact and the paternity of the said child is seriously disputed. It is further argued that the marriage of the revisionist with