VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAV
Babu @ Naseem – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikas Kunvar Srivastav, J.
1. The case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants Sri Sheikh Mohammad Ali, Advocate and learned A.G.A. for the State are present in the Court.
3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is moved on behalf of accused-applicants with following prayer:-
4. On perusal of record, it seems that vide order dated 16.09.2020, learned Additional Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magsitrate-II, Bahraich purported to have taken cognizance of offence and issued summons, fixing 13.10.2020, to the accused. It is obvious from the face of the summons that it is a typographical format having several blanks
Fakhruddin Ahmad Vs. State of Uttaranchal and Another reported in (2008) 17 SCC 157
Prasad Shrikant Purohit Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another reported in (2015) 7 SCC 440
Ajit Kumar Palit v. State of W.B. [AIR 1963 SC 765 : (1963) 1 Cri LJ 797]
R.R. Chari v. State of U.P. [AIR 1951 SC 207 : (1951) 52 Cri LJ 775 : 1951 SCR 312]
Darshan Singh Ram Kishan [(1971) 2 SCC 654 : 1971 SCC (Cri) 628 : AIR 1971 SC 2372]
Salap Service Station [1994 Supp (3) SCC 318 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1713]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.