SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 343

PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Mohammad Najmuddin (Minor) – Appellant
Versus
State of UP – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sadaful Islam Jafri, Mohammad Belal, Nazrul Islam Jafri (Senior Adv.)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri N.I. Jafri, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Sadaful Islam Jafri, learned counsel for revisionist and learned AGA for the State virtually.

2. Notice has been served to the informant and despite services, none appeared on his behalf nor any counter affidavit has been filed.

3. This criminal revision has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 21.09.2020, passed by Additional Special Judge (POCSO) Court No. 1, Allahabad, in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1571 of 2020, arising out of Case Crime No. 1087 of 2019, under Sections 363, 366, 376D, 120B IPC and Section 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Soraon, District Prayagraj, whereby the bail application of the juvenile Mohammad Najmuddin has been rejected.

4. The submission of the learned Senior Counsel is that the revisionist is a juvenile as determined by the Juvenile Justice Board and his case has been referred for trial as an adult in the Children Court.

5. As per FIR version, the victim is aged about 13 years. On 8.12.2019, in the night, she was taken by her Mausi, Usha Devi with two persons. Subsequently, when she was recovered, she stated that she went with her Mausi, accompanied b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top