SANJAY YADAV, PRAKASH PADIA
Tejal Uppal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the following relief:
B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directed to the respondent no. 1 to remitted back the possession as well as title of the land in question to its owner.
C. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondent no. 1 to consider and passed appropriate order on the representation dated 19/02/2021 submitted by the petitioner expeditiously within a suitable period. (Annexure no. 16).
D. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondent no. 2 to consider and passed appropriate order on the representation dated 12/10/2020 under section 17 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 submitted by the petitioner expeditiously within a suitable period. (Annexure no. 17).”
2. The facts as stated in the writ petition are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.