SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Uday Bhan Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Pashupati Colonizers Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the revision-applicant.
2. The present revision under Section 25 of Provincial Small Causes Courts Act is directed against the order dated 5.12.2020 passed by Additional District Judge/Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Court No. 5, Gorakhpur in S.C.C. Suit No. 9 of 2010 (Pashupati Colonizers Vs. Chandra Bhan Tripathi) whereby the court below has dismissed the application of the revision-applicant under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of C.P.C. for impleading him as respondent in the S.C.C. Suit No. 9 of 2010.
3. A suit for eviction has been instituted by the respondent No. 1-Pashupati Colonizers Private Limited contending inter-alia that Chandra Bhan Tiwari (since deceased) was tenant of the premise No. C-123/89 Purdilpur, District Gorakhpur. The rent of the premise has not been paid since January 2006. After the death of Sri Chandra Bhan Tiwari, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been substituted as his heirs.
4. In the suit, the revision-applicant filed an application paper No. 127-Ga under order 1 rule 10 (2) C.P.C. on the ground that his father late Ram Lakhan Tiwari was original tenant of the premises in question, and after his death, he along
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.