SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 453

VIVEK AGARWAL
Naveen Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amit Daga.

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK AGARWAL, J.

1. Sri. Amit Daga, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is seeking quashing of the criminal complaint dated 08.04.2019 as well as entire proceedings registered in its pursuance as Criminal Complaint Case No. 927 of 2019 (Brajendra Kumar Vyas vs. Naveen Saxena) under Section 138 of NI Act, Police Station Sipra Bazar, District Jhansi, including summoning order dated 15.02.2021 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Jhansi.

3. Grounds which have been put forth by learned counsel for the applicant to assail the impugned order are that applicant has been falsely implicated in a case of cheque bounce. It is submitted that the applicant had lost a cheque bearing no. 740500 issued by Dena Bank, Jhansi on account of applicant’s account no. 114010001415, which had slipped out of his pocket, though it was signed but blank alongwith a hundred rupee stamp paper bearing no. DA-498435 dated 21.12.2016. Applicant had lodged a report with the SSP, Jhansi by sending him an application through registered post on 06.12.2017, copy of complaint is enclosed as annexu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top