Y.K.SRIVASTAVA
Vikki – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned Additional Government Advocate-I appearing for the State opposite party.
2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking to quash the order dated 08.09.2020 passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge/F.T.C.1, Deoria in Criminal Revision No. 20 of 2020 (Vikki Vs. State of U.P.) and the order dated 17.1.2020 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 17, Deoria in Misc. Application No. 36 of 2020 arising out of Case Crime No. 924 of 2019 under Section 60/63 of the U.P. Excise Act, 19101 and 473 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Deoria.
3. The facts as reflected from the records of the case indicate that an application was filed by the applicant herein before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate seeking release of vehicle bearing Registration No. H.R.12AJ7586, Engine No. D13 A5636506 and Chassis No. MA3NYFB1SKE553161 contending that no recovery of any intoxicant had been made from the vehicle and that the applicant had possessed all the valid papers relating to the vehicle and accordingly a prayer was mad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.