Junaid vs State of U. P. - 2021 Supreme(All) 616

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mohammad Mustafa
For the Respondent: Maya Pati Pandey

JUDGMENT :

1. The judgment is being structured in the following conceptual framework to facilitate the discussion:

1.	Introduction
II	Submissions of learned counsels
III	Defining the controversy and its origins
IV	Rights of an accused in a bail application
V	Child rights jurisprudence : authorities and principles
VI	Relevant provisions from POCSO Act read with POCSO Rules:
		A	Right of victim to receive notice of the bail application and mode of service
		B.	Applicability of Section 439(IA) Cr.P.C.
		C.	Case Laws : Discussion
		D.	Enforcement of rights of the child under POCSO Act r/w POCSO Rules
		E.	Protecting the identity of the child
VII	Timeline and procedure for maturation of bail application
VIII	Monitoring and implementation of the directions in the judgment
IX	Order on bail application
X	Appendix

I. Introduction:

2. While arguing the bail application Sri Mohd. Mustafa, learned counsel for the applicant submitted at length