Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JJ.
Govind @ Radhe Lal - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and 3 Others - Respondents
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 4136 of 2021
Decided On : 14-07-2021
Indian Penal Code 1860 - Section 420 467 468 471 506 - Quash impugned FIR - Adoption deed - copy registered adoption deed has been filed as Annexure to petition which has not been disputed before us by respondent mother of respondent neither succeeded disputed land nor it has been alleged in impugned first information report that she could succeed disputed land - Allegation of informant that petitioner has fraudulently got his name mutated in revenue records on basis of alleged adoption deed is totally baseless informant / respondent has abused process of law by lodging first information report - Court are surprised that concerned Judicial Magistrate has passed order on application Section 156 CrPC without due application of mind – Held, Allegations made by informant in impugned FI R are absurd and proceeding has been instituted maliciously to convert a purely civil or revenue dispute in proceeding criminal law - Aforesaid and respectfully following law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in cases of Bhajan Lal and others (supra) and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd impugned first information report - District Sections 420 467 468 471 506 IPC lodged by informant – Respondent against petitioner cannot be sustained and is hereby quashed to secure ends of justice and to prevent abuse process of court - Clear that any observation made in body of this order shall not adversely affect any civil or revenue proceedings pending today or which may be initiated by respondent In other words if informant – respondent initiates any civil or revenue proceedings in accordance with law and as permissible under law same shall be decided by competent court/ Authority in accordance with law without being influenced by any of observations made in body of this order - Petition allowed
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Amit holding brief of Sri Sanjay Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Patanjali Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and Sri Rajesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant - respondent No.4.
2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, this writ petition is being finally heard.
3. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:
(ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to not to arrest the petitioner in Case Crime No.244 of 2021, U/S- 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 I.P.C., Police Station – Chhibramau, District Kannauj.”
4. The impugned first information report lodged by the informant – respondent No.4 and filed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition is being reproduced below:
I.I.F.-1 ¼,dhÑr tk¡p QkeZ&1½
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
çFke lwpuk fjiksVZ
1-District ¼ftyk½% dUUkkSt P.S. ¼Fkkuk½% dksrokyh fNcjkeÅ Year ¼o"kZ½ 2021
F.I.R. No. ¼ç-lw-fj-la-½% 0244 Date fnukad% 14@05@2021 16%21 cts
| Øålaå | Acts vf/kfu;e | Sections ¼/kkjk,a½ |
| 1- | Hkkånaålaå 1860 | 420 |
| 2- | Hkkånaålaå 1860 | 467 |
| 3- | Hkkånaålaå 1860 | 468 |
| 4- | Hkkånaålaå 1860 | 471 |
| 5- | Hkkånaålaå 1860 | 506 |
| 1. Day ¼fnu½% | From Date ¼fnukad ls½% | Date To ¼fnukad rd½ |
| Time Period ¼le; vof/k½% | Time From ¼le; ls½% | Time to ¼le; rd½% |
| (b) Information received at P.S. ¼Fkkuk tgk¡ lwpuk çkIr gqý% | |
| Date ¼fnukad½% | Time ¼le;½% |
| 14/05/2021 | 16:21 cts |
| (c) General Diary Reference ¼jkstukepk lanHkZ½% | Entry No. ¼Áfof"V la0½% 037 |
| Date & Time ¼fnukad vkSj le;½% 14@05@2021 | 16%21 cts |
4. Type of Information ¼lwpuk dk Ádkj½% fyf[kr
5. Place of Occurrence ¼?kVuk LFky½
1.(a) Direction and distance from P.S ¼Fkkuk ls nwjh vkSj fn'kk½% Beat No. ¼chV l0½%
(b) Address ¼irk½% vne rgjhjA
(c) In case, outside the limit of this police Station, then (;fn Fkkuk lhek ds ckgj gS rks½% Name of P.S. (Fkkuk dk uke½ District (State) (ftyk ¼jkT;½ % ¼mRrj Áns'k½
6. Complainant/Informant (f'kdk;rdrkZ@lwpukdrkZ½%
(a) Name (uke½% cztfd'kksj 'kkD;
(b) Father's/Husband's Name (firk dk uke½% lqesj 'kkD;
(c) Date/Year of Birth (tUe frfFk@o"kZ½% 2001
(d) Nationality (jk"Vªh;rk½% Hkkjr
(e) UID No. (;w0vkbZ0Mh0 la[;k½%
(f) Passport No. (ikliksVZ la[;k½%
Date of Issue (tkjh djus dh frfFk½%
Place of Issue (tkjh djus dk LFkku½%
(g) Occupation (O;olk;½%
(h) Address (irk½%
| S.No. ¼Øålaå½ | Address Type ¼irk dk çdkj½ | Address ¼irk½ |
| 1. | orZeku irk | cgoyiqj] dksrokyh fNcjkeÅ] dUUkkSt] mRRkj çns'k] Hkkjr |
| 2. | LFkk;h irk | cgoyiqj] dksrokyh fNcjkeÅ] dUUkkSt] mRRkj çns'k] Hkkjr |
7. Details of known/ suspected/ unknown accused with full particulars ¼Kkr@lafnX/k@vKkr vfHk;qDr dk iwjs fooj.k lfgr o.kZu½%
| S.No. ¼Ø0la0½ | Name ¼uke½ | Relative's Name ¼fj'rsnkj dk uke½ | Address ¼irk½ |
| 1 | xksfoUn mQZ jk/ksyky | firk&Lo0&egkjke | 1- cgoyiqj] dksrokyh fNcjkeÅ] dUukSt] mRrj Áns'k] Hkkjr |
9. Particulars of properties of interest ¼lEcfU/kr lEifr dk fooj.k½%
| S. No. ¼Ø0 la0½ | Property Type ¼lEifRr ds Ádkj½ | Sub-Type ¼mi&Ádkj½ | Value (In Rs/- ¼ewY;½ ¼#0 esa½ |
11. Inquest Report/U.D. Case No. if any ¼e`R;q leh{kk fjiksVZ@;w0Mh0 Ádj.k la0 ;fn dksbZ gks½%
| S. No. ¼Ø0la0½ | UIDB Number ¼;w0 |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
