SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 199

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, M. R. SHAH, SANJIV KHANNA
Neeharika Infrastructure Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Advocate, Mr. Vaibhav Tomar Advocate, Mr. Abhay Jadeja, Advocate, Ms. Barnalli Chowdhury, Advocate, Mr. Varun Satiya, Advocate, Mr. Karma Dorji, Advocate, Mr. Dechan W. Lachungpa, Advocate, Mrs. Pragya Baghel, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Sachin Patil, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Advocate, Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Advocate, Mr. Geo Joseph, Advocate, Mr. Diljeet Ahluwalia, Advocate, Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, Advocate, Ms. Neeha Nagpal, Advocate

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned interim order dated 28.09.2020 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition (ST) No. 2306 of 2020, by which, in an application filed by private respondent nos. 2 to 4 herein (hereinafter referred to as the 'original accused') under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the criminal proceedings being FIR No. 367/2019 dated 19.09.2019, the High Court has directed that "no coercive measures shall be adopted" against the original accused in respect of the said FIR, the original complainant has preferred the present appeal.

2. That the appellant herein has lodged an FIR against respondent nos. 2 to 4 herein - original accused at Worli Police Station, Mumbai for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. That the allegations against the original accused pertain to forgery and fabrication of Board Resolution and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top