Y.K.SRIVASTAVA
Vahin Saxena (Minor Corpus) – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Piyush Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Sanjay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and Ms. Sushma Soni, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for State respondents.
2. The petitioner no.2 asserting himself to be the father of petitioner no.1-corpus, has filed the present habeas corpus petition alleging that the corpus is under illegal custody of his mother-respondent no.4.
3. As per the pleadings in the petition, the petitioner no.1 is stated to have been born in the year 2012. On 6.01.2019, the respondent no.4 is said to have left her matrimonial home along with her minor child-petitioner no.1 and since then he is with his mother-respondent no.4. A divorce petition, registered as Case No. 1714/2020, is stated to be pending between the parties before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Agra.
4. Pursuant to the rule nisi issued on 23.7.2021, the petitioner no.1-corpus has been produced in court by his mother-respondent no.4, and they have been identified by Sri Sanjay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4.
5. Counsel for the parties do not dispute the fact that the child being a minor, it would be very difficult to ascertai
Elizabeth Dinshaw v. Arvand M. Dinshaw
Gaurav Nagpal v Sumedha Nagpal
Kanu Sanyal vs. District Magistrate Darjeeling
Mohammad Ikram Hussain vs. State of U.P. and others
Nithya Anand Raghvan v State (NCT of Delhi) and another
Sayed Saleemuddin vs. Dr. Rukhsana and others
Tejaswini Gaud and others vs. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.