SUNITA AGARWAL, SADHNA RANI THAKUR
Babita Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner remained absent though the matter has been date fixed with his consent. This is a matter arising out of the Election of Member, Kshetra Panchayat Lalai, Ward No. 42, Vikas Khand Hathwant, Firozabad. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner on 14.7.2021 on the legal issues and postponed the matter only to obtain instructions from the State Election Commission to ascertain the date of the declaration of the result. We, therefore, do not deem it fit to adjourn the matter today.
The written instructions have been supplied by the learned counsel for the respondent-State Election Commission on 14.7.2021. Further instructions in compliance of the order dated 14.7.2021 have also been placed before us today.
The Office is directed to upload the scanned copy of the written instructions and the compilation of cases supplied by the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Heard Sri Imran Syed learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Tarun Agrawal learned counsel for the respondent-State Election Commission, Sri Ajit Kumar Singh learned Add
Grindlays Bank Limited vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Kamlesh vs. Mukhya Nirwachan Ayukt and others
Krishna Ballabh Prasad Singh vs. Sub-Divisional Officer Hilsa-cum-Returning Officer and others
Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Shahdeo vs. State of Bihar and others
Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Chief Election Commissioner
N.P.Punnuswami vs. Returning Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.