IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MANOJ MISRA, JAYANT BANERJI, JJ.
District Basic Education And Another – Appellants
Versus
Shivkali And 4 Others – Respondents
Special Appeal Defective No.651 of 2021
Decided on : 06-10-2021
Service matter - Government Order - Application for gratuity - Age of superannuation - Scheme - Whether an employee who, by a certain a date, could exercise an option to retire early to avail the benefit of gratuity, dies before that date, and prior to his death had not exercised that option, should his heirs be denied the benefit of death gratuity which, otherwise, would have been available to them had that employee died at that age after exercising the option - Husband of first respondent was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 11.03.1974 in a basic school under Basic Shiksha Parishad. Later, he was promoted on the post of Headmaster. Initially, age of superannuation was 58 years which was enhanced to 60 years and, later, to 62 years. Before enhancement of age of superannuation to 62 years, by Government Order benefit of gratuity was introduced to teaching and non teaching staff of basic education institutions for those who opt to retire on attaining age of 58 years.
Finding of the Court :
Denying heirs/dependents of such an incumbent benefit of social security that, otherwise, would have been available to them had the incumbent exercised his option would defeat very purpose for which the policy was made. Thus, to ensure that policy serves its purpose fully, in our view, where a last date for exercise of option is yet to arrive and before that date incumbent dies, without exercising his option, his dependents should not be deprived of the benefit which they would have been otherwise entitled to had incumbent exercised his option - As by Government Order e age of superannuation was enhanced from 60 years to 62 years by specifically providing that benefits that were available on retirement at age of 58 years would now be available upon completion of the age of 60 years and those that were to be available at age of 60 years, would now be available on completion of age of 62 years, by necessary implication, option that could earlier be exercised upto first day of July in which the incumbent was to attain age of 58 years became exercisable upto first day of July in which incumbent would attain the age of 60 years - Thus, for all reasons given above, the benefit of death gratuity that would have been available to incumbent's dependents/ heirs on incumbent's death, before attaining the age of 60 years, under Government Order dated September 10, 2009, would be available to his heirs/dependents.
Result: Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Misra, J.
1. This intra-court appeal arises from a judgment and order of a Single Judge dated 02.02.2021 in Writ-A No.11578 of 2020 whereby, the writ petition of the first respondent was allowed with a direction upon the District Basic Education Officer, Basti (first appellant) and the Finance and Account Officer (Basic Education), Basti (second appellant) to compute the amount payable to the petitioner towards gratuity in terms of the scheme formulated by the Government Order dated September 16, 2009 and release the same along with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing the application for gratuity till the amount is actually disbursed.
2. In brief, the facts giving rise to the appeal are as follows:-
2. (i). The husband of the first respondent was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 11.03.1974 in a basic school under the Basic Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh. Later, he was promoted on the post of Headmaster. Initially, the age of superannuation was 58 years which was enhanced to 60 years and, later, to 62 years. Before enhancement of the age of superannuation to 62 years, by Government Order No.6369/15-5-93-55/89, dated 23.11.1994, the benefit of gratuity was introduced to teaching and non teaching staff of basic education institutions for those who opt to retire on attaining the age of 58 years. Such option, as per Clause 2 of the Government Order, dated 23.11.1994, was to be exercised within 90 days from the issuance of the Government Order. This period, however, was extended by Government Order No.5491/15-5-2002-212/2001, dated 10.06.2002, extracted below:-
2 (ii). Thereafter, on February 4, 2004, Government Order No.289/79-6-04-28(5)/2004 was issued enhancing the age of superannuation from 60 years to 62 years and, further, clarifying that the retiral dues that were to be available on attaining the age of 58 years would now be available at the age of 60 years; and those retiral dues that were to be available at the age of 60 years would now be available at the age of 62 years. The said Government Order is extracted below:-
| isz"kd] Jh gfjjkt fd'kksj lfpo] mRrj izns'k 'kkluA | lsok esa] f'k{kk funs'kd ¼csfld½ mRrj izns'k y[kuÅ |
| f'k{kk vuqHkkx&6 | y[kuÅ% fnukad % 4 Qjojh] 2004 |
Smt. Ranjana Kakkar Vs. State of U.P. and others: 2008 (10) ADJ 63
Service matter - Payment of a gratuity - Rule 5 of these Rules provided that a gratuity equal to six times pay last drawn by a teacher at time of his death would be payable provided he had put in not....
Voluntary retirement constitutes an option for gratuity eligibility, regardless of not opting to retire at the age of 60.
Once an option for extension of service beyond normal age of retirement with denial of benefit of gratuity had been exercised by a teacher, family members could not have claimed the benefit in confli....
Gratuity – Death-cum-retirement gratuity is benevolent scheme and same is extended to heirs/dependents of deceased employee.
Entitlement to gratuity for teachers retiring at 60 years is established by interpreting Government Orders and previous judgments, irrespective of retirement date and age options.
Pension and gratuity are not bounty but property within the meaning of Article 300-A of Constitution of India.
Gratuity cannot be withheld posthumously unless the employee's service was terminated; death in harness entitles the widow to full gratuity under the Act.
Retired employees are entitled to gratuity and interest on delayed payments, with the court having no discretion to deny interest under the Payment of Gratuity Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.