SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 826

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MANOJ MISRA, JAYANT BANERJI, JJ.
District Basic Education And Another – Appellants
Versus
Shivkali And 4 Others – Respondents
Special Appeal Defective No.651 of 2021
Decided on : 06-10-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Awadhesh Kumar
For the Respondent: Kamal Kumar Kesherwani

Point of Law: Death-cum-retirement gratuity - Benefit of gratuity - If husband of petitioner died before attaining the age of 60 years and has not given option for retirement at the age of 60 years, gratuity cannot be denied only on this ground.

Headnote:

Service matter - Government Order - Application for gratuity - Age of superannuation - Scheme - Whether an employee who, by a certain a date, could exercise an option to retire early to avail the benefit of gratuity, dies before that date, and prior to his death had not exercised that option, should his heirs be denied the benefit of death gratuity which, otherwise, would have been available to them had that employee died at that age after exercising the option - Husband of first respondent was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 11.03.1974 in a basic school under Basic Shiksha Parishad. Later, he was promoted on the post of Headmaster. Initially, age of superannuation was 58 years which was enhanced to 60 years and, later, to 62 years. Before enhancement of age of superannuation to 62 years, by Government Order benefit of gratuity was introduced to teaching and non teaching staff of basic education institutions for those who opt to retire on attaining age of 58 years.

Finding of the Court :

Denying heirs/dependents of such an incumbent benefit of social security that, otherwise, would have been available to them had the incumbent exercised his option would defeat very purpose for which the policy was made. Thus, to ensure that policy serves its purpose fully, in our view, where a last date for exercise of option is yet to arrive and before that date incumbent dies, without exercising his option, his dependents should not be deprived of the benefit which they would have been otherwise entitled to had incumbent exercised his option - As by Government Order e age of superannuation was enhanced from 60 years to 62 years by specifically providing that benefits that were available on retirement at age of 58 years would now be available upon completion of the age of 60 years and those that were to be available at age of 60 years, would now be available on completion of age of 62 years, by necessary implication, option that could earlier be exercised upto first day of July in which the incumbent was to attain age of 58 years became exercisable upto first day of July in which incumbent would attain the age of 60 years - Thus, for all reasons given above, the benefit of death gratuity that would have been available to incumbent's dependents/ heirs on incumbent's death, before attaining the age of 60 years, under Government Order dated September 10, 2009, would be available to his heirs/dependents.

Result: Appeal dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Manoj Misra, J.

1. This intra-court appeal arises from a judgment and order of a Single Judge dated 02.02.2021 in Writ-A No.11578 of 2020 whereby, the writ petition of the first respondent was allowed with a direction upon the District Basic Education Officer, Basti (first appellant) and the Finance and Account Officer (Basic Education), Basti (second appellant) to compute the amount payable to the petitioner towards gratuity in terms of the scheme formulated by the Government Order dated September 16, 2009 and release the same along with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing the application for gratuity till the amount is actually disbursed.

2. In brief, the facts giving rise to the appeal are as follows:-

2. (i). The husband of the first respondent was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 11.03.1974 in a basic school under the Basic Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh. Later, he was promoted on the post of Headmaster. Initially, the age of superannuation was 58 years which was enhanced to 60 years and, later, to 62 years. Before enhancement of the age of superannuation to 62 years, by Government Order No.6369/15-5-93-55/89, dated 23.11.1994, the benefit of gratuity was introduced to teaching and non teaching staff of basic education institutions for those who opt to retire on attaining the age of 58 years. Such option, as per Clause 2 of the Government Order, dated 23.11.1994, was to be exercised within 90 days from the issuance of the Government Order. This period, however, was extended by Government Order No.5491/15-5-2002-212/2001, dated 10.06.2002, extracted below:-

    ^^f'k{kk vuqHkkx&5 la[;k&5491@15 & 5&2002&212@2001] fnaukd 10 twu] 2002
    isz"kd]
    fnus'k pUnz dukSft;k]
    fo'ks"k lfpo]
    mRrj izns'k 'kklu]
    bykgkckn
    lsok esa]
    f'k{kk funs'kd] ¼csfld½ ,oa v/;{k]
    mRrj izns'k csfld f'k{kk ifj"kn~]
    bykgkcknA
    fo"k;% mRrj izns'k csfld f'k{kk ifj"knh; f'k{kd@f'k{k.ksRrj deZpkfj;ksa ds lsokfuo`frd ykHkkas esa ifjorZu gsrq fodYi dh lqfo/kk fn;s tkus ds laca/k esa uhfr fu/kkZj.kA
    egksn;]
    mi;qZDr fo"k;d 'kklukns'k la[;k& 6369@15&5&93&55@89] fnukad 23-11-1994 ds vuqdze esa eq>s ;g dgus dk funs'k gqvk gS fd mDr 'kklukns'k }kjk iznRr fodYi dks lqfo/kk ds ykHk ls oafpr jg x;s csfld f'k{kk ifj"kn f'k{kd@f'k{k.ksRrj deZpkfj;ksa ds laca/k esa fodYi ifjorZu dh lqfo/kk iznku fd;s tkus dh ekax ij lE;d~ fopkjksijkUr Jh jkT;iky ;g vkns'k iznku djrs gSa fd m0iz0 csfld f'k{kk ifj"knh; f'k{kdks@f'k{k.ksRrj deZpkfj;ksa }kjk lsokfuo`fRr ds ,d o"kZ vFkkZr~ ftl 'kSf{kd l= eas mudh lsokfuo`fRr gksxh] mldks igyh tqykbZ rd fodYi ifjorZu dj ldrs gSaA fdUrq ,sls deZpkjh tks 58 o"kZ dh vk;q ij lsokfuo`fRr dk fodYi nsrs gSa] dks lsokfuo`fRr ds iwoZ rd fodYi ifjorZu dh lqfo/kk vuqeU; gksxhA ;g O;oLFkk bl 'kklukns'k ds tkjh gksus dh frfFk ls ykxw gksxhA
    2- ;g vkns'k foRr foHkkx ds v'kkldh; la[;k&bZ&11@753 nl&2002] fnukad 4-6-2002 esa izkIr mudh lgefr ls tkjh fd;s tk jgs gSaA
    Hkonh;
    ¼fnus'k pUnz dukSft;k½
    fo'ks"k lfpoA


2 (ii). Thereafter, on February 4, 2004, Government Order No.289/79-6-04-28(5)/2004 was issued enhancing the age of superannuation from 60 years to 62 years and, further, clarifying that the retiral dues that were to be available on attaining the age of 58 years would now be available at the age of 60 years; and those retiral dues that were to be available at the age of 60 years would now be available at the age of 62 years. The said Government Order is extracted below:-

    ^^csfld ,oa lgk;rk izkIr mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa ds f'k{kdks a dh lsok fuo`fRr
    vk;q 60@62 o"kZ
    la[;k 289@79&6&04&28¼5½@2004

isz"kd]

Jh gfjjkt fd'kksj

lfpo]

mRrj izns'k 'kkluA

lsok esa]

f'k{kk funs'kd ¼csfld½

mRrj izns'k y[kuÅ

f'k{kk vuqHkkx&6

y[kuÅ% fnukad % 4 Qjojh] 2004

    fo"k; % ifj"knh; izkFkfed fo|ky;] ifj"knh; mPp izkFkfed fo|ky; rFkk mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa ds v/;kidksa dh vf/ko"kZrk vk;q orZeku 60 o"kZ ls 62 o"kZ fd;s tkus ds lEcU/k es









        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top