MOHD.ASLAM
Saima – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the for the State respondents.
2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have solemnized their marriage with each other according to Muslim Rites and Custom on 24.1.2021. No first information report has been registered against them.
4. As per notification of this Court, on account of prevailing Covid-19 pandemic, the clients are not permitted to enter into the Court premises unless otherwise their presence is directed by the Court, as such, the petitioners are not present in the Court.
5. The petitioners claim to be adults and married to each other of their own freewill, and for that they are being threatened and harassed.
6. In Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. 2006 Cr. L.J. 3312, while dealing with a case of harassment by the parents of the boy and girl, who had entered into inter-caste marriage, Hon'ble Supreme Court has issued directions to the Administration/Police authorities throughout th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.