SANGEETA CHANDRA
Buddhu – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This Revision has been filed by the revisionist under Section 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 05.12.2020 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Bahraich in Case Crime No. 715 of 2020 under Sections 363 and 366 I.P.C. Police Station Nanpara, District Bahraich.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that the revisionist's daughter was kidnapped by the opposite party no. 2 on 16.11.2020 when she was aged about 14 years. The revisionist lodged an F.I.R. on 16.11.2020. During investigation, the Investigating Officer produced the minor daughter of the revisionist before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Bahraich. The Revisionist gave an application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Bahraich for custody of daughter because he was the lawful guardian of her daughter. The date of birth of the daughter was 08.03.2006 as per record of the School. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate in determining the age of the daughter of the revisionist summoned the Head Master of Primary School who in his statement before the learned trial court corroborated that
Akbar Sheikh vs. State of Bengal
Abu Zar Hossain vs. State of Bengal
Ashwini Kumar Saxena vs. State of M.P. 2012 (9) SCC 750
Independent Thought vs. Union of India
Jarnail Singh vs. State of Haryana
Jitendra Arora and Others vs. Sukriti Arora and Others
Pawan vs. State of Uttaranchal
Parag Bhati vs. State of U.P. 2016 (12) SCC 744
Ramdev Chauhan vs. State of Assam
Razak Mohd vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.